|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Yeah that certainly sucks. If I were last to act, I'd bet the hell out of this turn. But being OOP I'll be looking to keep the pot as small as possible.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
I don't think checking and calling a bet keeps the pot any smaller than betting 3/4ths and then folding if raised.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Are you taking this line because the villain is tight? Or is this how you play it generally?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Just wondering because if you're going to bet 3/4 pot and fold to a raise, why not check-call up to a 3/4 pot bet and get to see the river which may fill up your boat... not only that you may be ahead anyway. I am generally not trying to win big pots OOP.
|
|
|