Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2005, 05:29 AM
Riposte Riposte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 142
Default Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush

Yeah that certainly sucks. If I were last to act, I'd bet the hell out of this turn. But being OOP I'll be looking to keep the pot as small as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2005, 05:35 AM
Malachii Malachii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 874
Default Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush

I don't think checking and calling a bet keeps the pot any smaller than betting 3/4ths and then folding if raised.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2005, 05:39 AM
Riposte Riposte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 142
Default Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush

Are you taking this line because the villain is tight? Or is this how you play it generally?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2005, 05:47 AM
Riposte Riposte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 142
Default Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush

Just wondering because if you're going to bet 3/4 pot and fold to a raise, why not check-call up to a 3/4 pot bet and get to see the river which may fill up your boat... not only that you may be ahead anyway. I am generally not trying to win big pots OOP.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.