Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2005, 10:30 PM
golfcchs golfcchs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 100
Default (22) Just making sure this is correct

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

CO (t755)
Button (t745)
SB (t780)
BB (t975)
UTG (t755)
UTG+1 (t980)
MP1 (t760)
MP2 (t1475)
Hero (t775)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t100</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB calls t85, BB calls t70.

Flop: (t300) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, Hero Push

Just wanted to be sure this is a standard play (have started revaluate my game because of some variance). Is 2 overs and the nut flush draw enough to push?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2005, 05:46 AM
TylerD TylerD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 671
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

More than enough given your stack size/pot/folding equity. Standard.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

It is sensabel to put your chips in before the flop because you have best hand. This is how I play.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:35 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

I play it the same.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:54 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

Would this play the same on a board with 2 high cards? Say it was J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] where there's a higher chance that another player picked up a pair, two pair, or a straight draw. Is this still an instapush?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:13 PM
DDH DDH is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

[ QUOTE ]
Would this play the same on a board with 2 high cards? Say it was J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] where there's a higher chance that another player picked up a pair, two pair, or a straight draw. Is this still an instapush?

[/ QUOTE ]

That flop actually gives you more outs as well. Now plus your over cards and flush draw, you've picked up a straight draw, four more outs. All the more reason to get your money in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:26 PM
mhcmarty mhcmarty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 10
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

I'd make a pot sized continuation bet. You can find out if your behind for less then your entire stack. At this level, players in the blinds love to check raise. You might get a call from a flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:27 PM
DDH DDH is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

[ QUOTE ]
I'd make a pot sized continuation bet. You can find out if your behind for less then your entire stack. At this level, players in the blinds love to check raise. You might get a call from a flush draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

300 in the pot, you only have 675 left, I don't like just betting half my stack and hoping for a fold, because that leaves me only 375 to bet into an pot of at least 900 chips if I get called. I'd just put it all in there.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:34 PM
mosdef mosdef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 168
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

[ QUOTE ]
I'd make a pot sized continuation bet. You can find out if your behind for less then your entire stack. At this level, players in the blinds love to check raise. You might get a call from a flush draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a mistake IMO. Finding out that you are behind (presumably because villain reraises?) has no value because the pot will be so large relative to your remaining stack that the correct move will be to call the raise anyway. I agree that you may extract some extra value from a lower flush draw, how often are they going to call a preflop raise with two diamonds lower than the A and K?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:57 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (22) Just making sure this is correct

So when you make this push, are you actually hoping for a call because you have a strong draw? On the original flop, with the PF raise and a strong push, you're pretty likely to just get a fold. But on a more coordinated/higher board, you're more likely to run into someone who is willing to call with TPGK and a draw or something like that.

I guess if you look at the FE of the push, plus the outs you have to make the hand if someone does call the push, its the right play. I'm still working on tightening up that part of my game. I think if I'm hero here, my typical play would be to cbet out about t250 into the t300 pot, leaving myself 10+BB if one of the blinds check-raised. Though I guess considering I'd almost have to call that check-raise anyway, I probably should have just pushed all-in in the first place, huh?

Maybe that's a leak in my game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.