Party $50 NL Tight Passive Play making 7 BB/100.

[Dragonboy]

20 VPIP, 3% PFR, Avg Aggression .5, W$SD 60%, over 30k hands and at 7 BB/100. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

My style: screw pre-flop, all post flop.

[ghostface]

What in gods name do those stats mean. They are various player stats and none of them is winning 7BB/100.

?

[Dragonboy]

[ QUOTE ]
What in gods name do those stats mean. They are various player stats and none of them is winning 7BB/100.


[/ QUOTE ]

Are you retarded or just blind? All the VPIP, PFR, and W$SD are very close. Hmm..perhaps they are multiple accounts under the same player who multi-tables??? Hmm..maybe don'tcha think?

Basically I avg out all my accounts under the last 30k hands which I 4 table with...and these are my avg stats. If you know how to amalgamate them together in PT to under just one name - I'm all open ears.

If you also avg the BB/100 it works to slightly a bit less than 7 BB/100.

I play a pretty passive game pre-flop with lots of smooth calling limps and raises, which goes to show that it doesn't take a lot of aggression to win in small stakes NL for 7 BB/100 yet so many people try too hard pre-flop to muster the aggression when it's not warranted/needed.

[Muisyle]

General info -> Aliases

Are we supposed to be patting you on the back or something? Add more agression and you could probably turn that 7 into 10...

[Reef]

TAG > TP

I think you're a little too tight for 6 max

[-Skeme-]

Is this PT? Nice color scheme.

[Marnixvdb]

funny. if I average your bb/100 I get 3.5 bb/100

[theredpill5]

You can't average them. That isn't mathematically sound. Each one is weighted since each one has a different amount of hands. You have to add up the total money and hands and do it that way.

[Marnixvdb]

what do you think i did?

[excession]

What you don't tell us is WtSD% (went to showdown when you saw the flop) - with a W$SD of 60% your WtSD% is probably 15-20% or so making you borderline weak-tight. I'm also guessing you play pretty much fit or fold.

You are benefitting from bad overaggressives betting into you when you have the goods. So long as you read OK post-flop you can make a profit playing just about any style on these $50 tables. You may even be an inveterate slowplayer.

7PTBB/100 is fine but I expect you would make about 12.5PTBB/100 if you were more aggressive post-flop. My PTBB/100 on these tables since the stack changes at Party is more like 15.


Overall Tight Passives don't even outrun the rake. It isn't a great strategy compared to Tight Agreesive (or at these tables Slightly Loose Aggressive). In fact at these levels as sLA's play more +EV hands than TA's they have a slightly better win rate (though if multi-tabling TA's can play more tables0