Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2005, 08:37 AM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9
Default Why not Grossman?

Honest question, why not? Does Orton really bring more to the table?

I've never been a Grossman fan at all, and it is an obvious gamble, but I think the Bears possesing a capable offense could turn them into serious title contenders and the reward >>> risk.

(also i haven't watched a bears game the entire season, please feel free to correct me)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2005, 09:02 AM
VarlosZ VarlosZ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 68
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

They won't play Grossman because they've been winning with Orton, but I'm on your side. By just about any measure, Orton has been the worst starting QB in the league. It's very unlikely that Grossman would be worse.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2005, 09:05 AM
Sluss Sluss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Still finishing bleeding
Posts: 220
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

Well right now Grossman isn't 100% and he hasn't played since week 2 of last year. So he's pretty rusty and right now Orton has won 8 in a row.

The real sickining part right now is with the defense and the running game this team can go far in the playoffs. With Grossman they could be scary good. Of course if he comes in a starts making mistakes they could break up a pretty good thing.

FWIW, please let Grossman take over I want to go to the Super Bowl.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2005, 09:57 AM
mrbaseball mrbaseball is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 384
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

QB isn't really the offenses problem. The recievers are horrible and almost never open and yesterday anyway the pass protection was real bad. Grossman or any QB you can name would not have made much difference in yesterdays game. Defenders were pretty much draped over the Bears woeful recievers on every play.

At least Orton is making less mistakes and giving the defense a chance to win. Grossman would not improve things a bit and may actually be a step backwards at this point.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2005, 12:53 PM
pokerdirty pokerdirty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PR 20+2 SnGs...
Posts: 33
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, please let Grossman take over I want to go to the Super Bowl.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not that I'm saying this could happen, but Jesus, could you imagine if Chicago would win 2 sports championships within a year of each other? The city might spontaneously combust.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:03 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

It would be stupid to a) rush Grossman and b) create a QB controversy in the middle of the season. I don't think it's a given that Grossman would be better right now, and it might just create an unnecessary distraction.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:16 PM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bloomington , IN
Posts: 325
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

[ QUOTE ]
It would be stupid to a) rush Grossman and b) create a QB controversy in the middle of the season. I don't think it's a given that Grossman would be better right now, and it might just create an unnecessary distraction.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree. Grossman has never proven anything in the NFL, except that he can get hurt. If he had established himself as their starter, instead of just their hope for the future, then things would be different.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:17 PM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

All,
I thnk this leads to another question. If Chi gets to the NFC Championship game (or beyond) is the organization tied to Orton? Does Rex become trade bait?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:35 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

pfunk,

No, definitely not.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:32 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 911
Default Re: Why not Grossman?

you mean 68yds passing isn't good?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.