|
|
#1
09-05-2005, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
I moved from 2/4 full to 3/6 6m a few months ago. I ran poorly at 3/6 6m, got outplayed, and lost money overall. So what did I do with my small br? Moved up! I warned you low content [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
 Obviously, I'm running very well so far at 5/10. I've also played a lot of sh (avergae players is 4.9 for 5/10 according to pt) so I'm not as loose as I look, although the avergae players for 3/6 was 5.3 so obviously i fixed some leaks. The 3/6 is over 4 weeks and 5/10 is all within the last 7 days. 
|
|
#2
09-05-2005, 08:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
What's the point?
|
|
#4
09-05-2005, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What's the point? [/ QUOTE ] Move up when you cannot beat a lower limit. [/ QUOTE ] Seems like the same logic that says that because I limped UTG with 72o and made a full house that I made the right move limping.
|
|
#5
09-05-2005, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What's the point? [/ QUOTE ] Move up when you cannot beat a lower limit. [/ QUOTE ] Seems like the same logic that says that because I limped UTG with 72o and made a full house that I made the right move limping. [/ QUOTE ] he was being funny i dont understand the point of OP. you were running bad before, and you are running good now. that's poker [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] your went to showdown is v. high too which is adding to your variance a lot
|
|
#6
09-05-2005, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What's the point? [/ QUOTE ] Move up when you cannot beat a lower limit. [/ QUOTE ] He didn't say he couldn't beat 3/6. He just run poorly there and then ran good at 5/10. Good timing!
|
|
#7
09-05-2005, 08:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What's the point? [/ QUOTE ] Move up when you cannot beat a lower limit. [/ QUOTE ] Seems like the same logic that says that because I limped UTG with 72o and made a full house that I made the right move limping. [/ QUOTE ] he was being funny [/ QUOTE ] I was talking about the OP.
|
|
#8
09-05-2005, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 and 5/10 wr correlation (also: variance rules us) *LC*
I should have included in the op that there was really no point. I just thought some people might find it interesting, especially people having a tough time at 3/6 who are thinking of moving up (you probably shouldnt, im not giving advice, but that doesnt mean it wont be interesting at least).
Sorry if I wasted your time! I'm new and this monster variance is still novel and interesting to me.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
