|
View Poll Results: Axs Hands | |||
AKs only | 6 | 11.54% | |
AQs - AKs | 18 | 34.62% | |
AJs - AKs | 13 | 25.00% | |
ATs - AKs | 10 | 19.23% | |
A9s - AKs | 4 | 7.69% | |
A8s - AKs | 0 | 0% | |
A7s - AKs | 1 | 1.92% | |
A6s - AKs | 0 | 0% | |
A5s - AKs | 0 | 0% | |
A4s - AKs | 0 | 0% | |
A3s - AKs | 0 | 0% | |
A2s - AKs | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 QQ lines with an Ace on the flop. Which one is dumber?
[ QUOTE ]
wow, hand one is donktastic!!! you know, for just one more SB you could have gotten a showdown? But you decide to put 2bbs in on the flop for God knows what reason. Trying to induce KK to fold maybe? [/ QUOTE ] I agree. I was very upset with myself after playing it this way. Whats your line? Check the flop and call the turn and river like I did in hand 2? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 QQ lines with an Ace on the flop. Which one is dumber?
Yeah, I'm ok with that line. It is just that the "normal" range for 3betting is JJ-AA, AK/AQ. Fine, villian might be an agro-donk, but against normal players, I can even fold the turn (or the flop had he bet it). I hear tell that the 30/60 is full of light 3bettors (I play 20/40), so that might make this a check/call down, but I'm not about to initiate betting against a somewhat sane 3bettor with an ace on the board.
Note: It has become commonplace even at 20/40 to 3bet 77+ in position, and that too might make this a call down. But with QQ- I am able to fold a flop with an ace after being 3bet PF. Player/situation dependant, of course. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 QQ lines with an Ace on the flop. Which one is dumber?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] wow, hand one is donktastic!!! you know, for just one more SB you could have gotten a showdown? But you decide to put 2bbs in on the flop for God knows what reason. Trying to induce KK to fold maybe? [/ QUOTE ] I agree. I was very upset with myself after playing it this way. Whats your line? Check the flop and call the turn and river like I did in hand 2? [/ QUOTE ] Roy, you came up with a good plan(betting the flop with the intention of checking the turn) You just didnt execute it. What I mean is in your situation either you have the villain beat and he is drawing to 2 outs, or he flopped a monster and is trying to trap you. If the villain is trying to trap you he will either checkraise the flop, or wait til the turn to checkraise. In this situation betting the flop with the intention of checking the turn and calling all rivers is the best strategy IMO. If you bet the flop and the villain checkraises, just fold. Also, if you bet the flop, and check the turn and the villain checks again, then bet the river for value. In this situation where there is a high probability that the villain is trapping you, taking the "bet flop check turn line" you will lose .5BB or 1.5BB when your trailing, and you will win 1.5BB when you are ahead. If you take the check flop call down line, you will lose 2BB when behind and win 2BB when ahead. Becuz I believe you will usually be trailing in this situation I like the "bet flop check turn line" becuz you will lose less in the long run. Of course if youre against a really tricky aggressive opponent, then I would go with the check flop call down line, since you can never get outplayed off the best hand using this line. |
|
|