#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m beginning to wonder why I should bother.
There's no reason to play 2/4 if you have a bankroll that can support 12/24. fwiw, i find most online 3/6 and 5/10 games to be just as good as the 2/4 games. However, if you enjoy live play and it is close, you should just go mop up that 12/24.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m beginning to wonder why I should bother.
[ QUOTE ]
There's no reason to play 2/4 if you have a bankroll that can support 12/24. [/ QUOTE ] Huh? What do you know about his reasons? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what do you consider a good table?
A table that I can identify 1-3 seats that I have an advantage over depending on how big an advantage and position.
- Jim |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what do you consider a good table?
How is table VPIP calculated in PA? If it's the average of invididual VPIPs that's a bad number.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what do you consider a good table?
well put and less snarky then i was going to reply.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what do you consider a good table?
something like that. it's definitely affected by the number of hands you have played against a particular opponent.
say, for example, you sit down with 8 maniacs against which you have 50 hands each. and one tag you'veplayed 5,000 hands against. your "table" stats will read like your tag's stats read. so, essentially... the "table" stats are purdy useless |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what do you consider a good table?
Some loose bad people to my right. Some weaktight morans to my left.
|
|
|