Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:14 AM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

you sure?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:15 AM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: It\'s hot in here
Posts: 551
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

[ QUOTE ]
you sure?

[/ QUOTE ]

100%
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:19 AM
crosse91 crosse91 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the kiddie pool.....
Posts: 136
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

agreed, this is a pretty easy call preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:20 AM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

i think original poster would come out better in the end by folding to this pre flop raise...of course this depends on a few factors that neither your nor I know.

i don't think it's a "100% you got the odds man" call as it may seem to some.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:22 AM
crosse91 crosse91 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the kiddie pool.....
Posts: 136
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

b/c his hand is pretty transparent with the limp-call?
b/c 22 gets set over setted more often then others?
are you from georgia?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:28 AM
snappo snappo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

I would raise the flop to $300 and then shove the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:31 AM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

[ QUOTE ]
b/c his hand is pretty transparent with the limp-call?

[/ QUOTE ]

to me, yes; to villian, i'm not sure...if he can win pots without flopping sets vs the villian then obviously this is a call...but if that's the case he doesn't really need a hand anyways, right?

[ QUOTE ]
b/c 22 gets set over setted more often then others?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah...if he puts villian on a pocket pair with his preflop raise then that's definitely a factor to consider...also how far will villian go with a pair after the flop if he too doesn't flop a set. All points that need to be considered

It really comes down to what is hero going to do the 7/8 times he doesn't flop a set? If he's playing the "no set no bet" type of poker then he is better off just folding in my opinion with 22...

He's got to get a ton of action when does flop a set and his set has to be good...i think hero overestimated how much he may get when he flops a set...i think a lot of people do that with hands like 22, 33, and 44

Anyways just my thoughts...could be wrong.

P.S.

[ QUOTE ]
are you from georgia?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, sophomore at UGA
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:38 AM
trevor trevor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 33
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

[ QUOTE ]
i don't think it's a "100% you got the odds man" call as it may seem to some.

[/ QUOTE ]

I call here 100% of the time. I'm not on the set over set bandwagon so PF is standard.

My default line is to raise the flop. 1)It's draw heavy 2)AA and AK are good possibilities 3)Nobody ever folds and you have a good hand, build the pot.

Pot it on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:42 AM
trevor trevor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 33
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

[ QUOTE ]
He's got to get a ton of action when does flop a set and his set has to be good...i think hero overestimated how much he may get when he flops a set...i think a lot of people do that with hands like 22, 33, and 44

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll venture a guess and say that most of the above is incorrect. Everyone check their PT stats for set over set for pairs < 5 5 and also what your EV is for 44-22. I doubt it's -EV.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:42 AM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not on the set over set bandwagon so PF is standard.


[/ QUOTE ]

i don't know what that means.

please elaborate.

thanks in advance.

holla.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.