|
|
|
|
#1
11-02-2005, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simpler Question to Avoid PrayingMantis\'s Wrath
I think somewhere in the past, before this seperate thread, David specified no special connection to the case. It was supposed to assume the same basic evidence anyone could have seen by watching CourtTV or whatever it was on back then.
|
|
#2
11-02-2005, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Simpler Question to Avoid PrayingMantis\'s Wrath
[ QUOTE ]
I think somewhere in the past, before this seperate thread, David specified no special connection to the case. It was supposed to assume the same basic evidence anyone could have seen by watching CourtTV or whatever it was on back then. [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough, I was talking about the general method. chez
|
|
#3
11-02-2005, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Simpler Question to Avoid PrayingMantis\'s Wrath
[ QUOTE ]
David specified no special connection to the case. It was supposed to assume the same basic evidence anyone could have seen by watching CourtTV or whatever it was on back then. [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. What that does is standardize the 'why' part which means we can substitute 'what belief' for 'why they have it' in this case. It is still the 'why' that is being tested, it's just buried in the premise.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
