Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2005, 02:04 PM
1C5 1C5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hippo Island, South Pacific
Posts: 846
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

let me know what filters to use, i will tell me stats good or bad, have 2500+ tournaments in my PT...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2005, 04:45 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

I do for sure (although I play at 'Stars which have deeper stacks, dunno about PP). I will limp any pair or call a reasonable size raise at level 1, limp in mid-late position at level 2, limp middle pairs in late position (or after other limpers) at level 3. When the blinds get to 50/100 I do it very rarely (maybe a big family pot)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2005, 04:58 PM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

I also play at stars, but Im debating whether it should be done on party, Im sure we all agree that on stars limping is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2005, 04:11 AM
tjh tjh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

I would not mind seeing some PT data on PP.

I would like to add that I like Pocket pairs when the flop comes paired. A paired flop is less likely to have helped anyone so a bet at the pot can take it down. Of course this is a way ahead way behind play. Just another factor to consider.

--
tjh
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2005, 09:59 PM
jeffraider jeffraider is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

I've been thinking about this recently. I've been limping them for 15 chips in Level 1 but folding 77 and worse in level 2. I think that's okay, but I've noticed some of my favourite posters saying that they should be folded.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2005, 10:04 PM
swiftrhett swiftrhett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 61
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

I'm folding 66 and worse. I think 77 is ok. Obviously, there are still a lot of times I play them, shorthnaded and on the blinds. I may limp with small pairs on level on, then give up limping 22-66 on level 2.

[ QUOTE ]
I've been thinking about this recently. I've been limping them for 15 chips in Level 1 but folding 77 and worse in level 2. I think that's okay, but I've noticed some of my favourite posters saying that they should be folded.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2005, 10:43 AM
Emmitt2222 Emmitt2222 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Viva la Papa
Posts: 576
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

I'm assuming most of these responsees are almost exclusive to Party? I play at Stars where you have t1500 so I play alot looser in the earlier rounds, definitely limping with any pp. Because of the drastic increase in starting chips limping more is better at Stars correct? Or am I missing something that it is still right to be incredibly tight until the later rounds?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2005, 11:16 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm assuming most of these responsees are almost exclusive to Party? I play at Stars where you have t1500 so I play alot looser in the earlier rounds, definitely limping with any pp. Because of the drastic increase in starting chips limping more is better at Stars correct? Or am I missing something that it is still right to be incredibly tight until the later rounds?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, you're right, limping any PP and even calling raises after you've limped is much less borderline and much more +$EV with a T1500 stack than a T800 stack.

At party I usually dont "open limp" smaller PPs, I wait for someone else to make a move before me because:

1. You get a better estimate of how many people youre gonna share the pot with.

2. It usually takes a bigger hand to raise lots of limpers than to raise just one limper or open raise, thus you are more likely to get to see your flop without being reraised.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:13 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

Why does no one say anything about the players at the table? If you are at a very passive table, where there are frequently 5 players or more seeing the flop, and people don't mind going to showdown with bottom pair, your small pp's are great.

If you are at a table where the average player is TAG, few people seeing the flop, and often for a raise and where people don't 'chase', they are not as good.

This is true right? Then doesn't that mean that you should limp less with low pp's as you go to higher buy-ins? It would be nice if some g00t player made everything clear. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:26 PM
Insty Insty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 121
Default Re: Should you play low PP\'s early in $10/$20\'s?

[ QUOTE ]
Playing 22-66 may give you a slight +ChipEV, but it seems that it gives you a slight -$EV when you use ICM.

[/ QUOTE ]

Huh?
What do you mean by "when you use ICM".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.