Self-Titled (NSFW) - Page 4

tonypaladino · #31 12-10-2005, 10:50 PM

Owl,

You should have stopped while we were impressed.

#32 12-10-2005, 10:51 PM

#33 12-10-2005, 10:52 PM

#34 12-10-2005, 10:53 PM

[censored] · #35 12-10-2005, 10:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't really get this account utmt40

Dynasty · #36 12-10-2005, 10:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]

You should have stopped while we were impressed.

[/ QUOTE ]

People don't know how to manage their gimmick accounts. They make one good post and then follow it up with a bunch of crappy ones.

As far as the porn policy, I believe it's been very consistent.

Talk2BigSteve · #37 12-10-2005, 10:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You can not post porn images on the forums. Links are fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you serious?

[/ QUOTE ]

that's pretty much the policy I as understand it too as stated by Mat in the very first sticky post

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but since when has it been enforced? I don't care, and it definitely should be in this thread because of no NSFW tag, but it seems like this rule falls thru the cracks a lot.

[/ QUOTE ]

IIRC I got banned before not for overly gay [censored] as you might think, but for posting a 20 question Real or Fake Boobs Test with the Pictures....Yes, When I posted Breasts I was immediately banned! What Drama! What Irony! [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Big Steve [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

Dominic · #38 12-11-2005, 12:32 AM

you know, I can honestly say that if Jennifer aniston wanted to go out on a date with me, I'd probably say yes, because she is a reasonably attractive woman, but I don't get how she's suddenly supossed to be some "hottie." She's not.

A perfectly attractive girl-next-door, yes.
A bombshell, no.

Dominic · #39 12-11-2005, 12:35 AM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG....this is the best owl yet.

Piz0wn0reD!!!!!! · #40 12-11-2005, 01:06 AM

dude you stole my gimmik idea! i even made the account and they never sent me an email!!!!
OMFG@!