|
|
#11
11-21-2005, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
I like C-Ring as well, but if you C-R a lot then you need to throw some bluff C-Rs as well usually against above average players, defending against a steal etc. My AF stats 2.5/2.9/1.8 (I dont fold a lot on the river) and C/R 2.5%: 62/34/4. But stats are not important anyway [/ QUOTE ] Stats are incredibly important. I make at least 15% of my plays based on stats. It helps you make countless value bets and bluff raises. God I love stats. Probably why I don't play live as much (or because I hate NL cash games). 
|
|
#12
11-21-2005, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
Now, I'm assuming a lot of you don't check-raise as much as I do. I think we should discuss why. [/ QUOTE ] Because you guys check raise too much.
|
|
#13
11-21-2005, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Now, I'm assuming a lot of you don't check-raise as much as I do. I think we should discuss why. [/ QUOTE ] Because you guys check raise too much. [/ QUOTE ] That post is geared towards multiway play where people are trying to "push people off pots". It is not geared towards the SH, and blind defense situations that we will generally be dealing with here.
|
|
#14
11-21-2005, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It seems like your flop aggression is too high (even for the standards on this forum). [/ QUOTE ] A lot of the posters on this forum are weak/tight. [/ QUOTE ] Either that or they're passing up on lots of profitable calls.
|
|
#16
11-21-2005, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
Haha, my post was more intended towards people trying to defend the undefendable hand. Value is the most important thing, unless our hand has no showdown value. AK on a K86 flop does not need a check-raise, it wants bets.
|
|
#17
11-21-2005, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Now, I'm assuming a lot of you don't check-raise as much as I do. I think we should discuss why. [/ QUOTE ] Because you guys check raise too much. [/ QUOTE ] That post is geared towards multiway play where people are trying to "push people off pots". It is not geared towards the SH, and blind defense situations that we will generally be dealing with here. [/ QUOTE ] I'm all for more c/r's at 6-max. Lord knows no one does any right now.
|
|
#18
11-22-2005, 12:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
Would it be helpful to micro-limiters if I started saving some where I have reads and explain why it's better than flop aggression or would this just be a trite exercise?
|
|
#19
11-23-2005, 03:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My post-sabattical stats: Flop: 3.70 Turn: 2.56 River: 2.07 Total: 2.95 [/ QUOTE ] It seems like your flop aggression is too high (even for the standards on this forum). [/ QUOTE ] A lot of the posters on this forum are weak/tight. [/ QUOTE ] bump a HUSH downswing thread where aggression factors are discussed. many very good players agree that your flop aggression factor is too high.
|
|
#20
11-23-2005, 03:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My post-sabattical stats: Flop: 3.70 Turn: 2.56 River: 2.07 Total: 2.95 [/ QUOTE ] It seems like your flop aggression is too high (even for the standards on this forum). [/ QUOTE ] A lot of the posters on this forum are weak/tight. [/ QUOTE ] bump a HUSH downswing thread where aggression factors are discussed. many very good players agree that your flop aggression factor is too high. [/ QUOTE ] Huh. Maybe I need to look over some hands and be a bit more passive as well.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
