|
|
#21
10-05-2005, 12:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Definitive Guide to Stacking \'The Don\'
yeah, i like limping for set value more when they raise than when they don't for that very reason
|
|
#22
10-05-2005, 12:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Definitive Guide to Stacking \'The Don\'
[ QUOTE ]
i liked it [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] didn't find it to be a bad beat post, there wasn't enough swearing and/or throwing mice involved maddox would be proud [/ QUOTE ] Have you ever actually read any Maddox? He hates crappy knock offs.
|
|
#23
10-05-2005, 02:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Definitive Guide to Stacking \'The Don\'
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i liked it [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] didn't find it to be a bad beat post, there wasn't enough swearing and/or throwing mice involved maddox would be proud [/ QUOTE ] Have you ever actually read any Maddox? He hates crappy knock offs. [/ QUOTE ] Well, if I decided to randomly go on an anti-hippy/feminist/vegitarians/people-who-drive-souped-up-civics rant in the middle then he would consider me a knock off. Otherwise, his writing style (albeit at the highest possible level of cynillity) is fairly standard among satirical writers. Also, I tried to justify myself mathematically 10 minutes before I went to class and didn't look at all the factors (read: I was wrong). I still think the argument is pointless given the self-deprecating nature of the OP. I wasn't looking for a poker discussion here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
