Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table

[POKhER]

You have....
<font color="white">
KJ/KQ/AK
</font>


You say its a legit raise do i assume you dont hold J2/K2/22

2pair at most you have, no set IMO.

River looks like you realise you only hold one pair so call.

So yeah, i reckon you lost.

[cold_cash]

Since you didn't raise the river I would say KJ.

Since you had 22 I would say raise the river.

[NateDog]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think the table sees me as a little too LAG PF, and way too LAG post-flop (checkraise bluff caps and such). I have shown down my fair share of winners, but most of those have been played very passively.

[/ QUOTE ]

And then you go and open-raise 22? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

You aren't openraising this from the button?

[eviljeff]

*grunch*
looks like AA, AK, or KJ
maybe some draw/pair combination like A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[eviljeff]

[ QUOTE ]
Nice trifecta

JJ or KK

[/ QUOTE ]

no way. not 3betting this river with JJ/KK is unimaginable.