Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-05-2005, 08:10 PM
Benholio Benholio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 238
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

AA vs KK for $200 is definately more risky than clearing a $200 CON (we're talking about CON right?) bonus at blackjack. Less $EV too...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-05-2005, 08:17 PM
sexdrugsmoney sexdrugsmoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stud forum
Posts: 256
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

[ QUOTE ]
AA vs KK for $200 is definately more risky than clearing a $200 CON (we're talking about CON right?) bonus at blackjack. Less $EV too...

[/ QUOTE ]

If by CON you mean Casino-On-Net, no.
If you mean "online casino", yes. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Specifically it was about Casino365 which (unfortunately) isn't no risk like the Cryptos as it treats all wagered money as yours first, so you can't play, lose and withdraw your original deposit. (you ain't losing bonus money when you're playing etc)

I decided when I started Casino Whoring I would *never* use my own money on something so risky, that's why I'm trying to do the math using the AA vs KK example.

Cheers,
SDM
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-05-2005, 10:55 PM
sfwusc sfwusc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Moving out of the kiddie Pool
Posts: 742
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

Casino whoring variance is higher than Poker.

Hourly rate is also higher.

If you do $10 bets at BJ, then the casino on the net bonus is over $100 an hour.

You would have to be four tabling a nice limit to be making that.

-SFWUSC
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-05-2005, 11:09 PM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

Two Questions:
1. Smaller bets = smaller variance?
2. Ignoring hourly rate and just looking at gross profits, bet size doesn't matter over time, right? Or am I missing something.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:24 AM
ttw22 ttw22 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 55
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

[ QUOTE ]
Two Questions:
1. Smaller bets = smaller variance?
2. Ignoring hourly rate and just looking at gross profits, bet size doesn't matter over time, right? Or am I missing something.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes and yes.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:29 AM
TheMetetron TheMetetron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Two Questions:
1. Smaller bets = smaller variance?
2. Ignoring hourly rate and just looking at gross profits, bet size doesn't matter over time, right? Or am I missing something.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes and yes.

[/ QUOTE ]

2) Not necessarily. I know I have more casino bonuses to do then there is time in a month, so larger bet sizes are mandatory for me. They do increase my gross profits. However, for most people, you are right.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:13 AM
BluEsiNsOuL BluEsiNsOuL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 135
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

Can someone post or PM me a good guide of casino whoring? Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:26 AM
SoCalRugger SoCalRugger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

[ QUOTE ]
Can someone post or PM me a good guide of casino whoring? Thanks in advance.

[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.bonusbug.com/cgi-bin/yabb...i?board=casino
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:21 PM
parttimepro parttimepro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 227
Default Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)

To answer the AA vs. KK question:
If you go all in with AA and get called by KK, you will win $200 81% of the time, and lose $200 18.5% of the time. EV = 200 * .81 - 200 * .185 = 125.

At Bet365, it's a little more complicated. Algebraicly, we can determine that the average EV is the bonus minus (wager requirements times house advantage). EV = 200 - (4000 * .005) = 180. There's a wide distribution of possible outcomes. You could lose your whole $200 or you could win $1000. Based on the earlier calculations, 15% of the time, you will lose money, and 15% of the time, you will win more than $380 (i.e. cash out $580 or more).

Bigger bets mean more variance, but they don't change the EV. In other words, if you bet $20 a hand, you'll have a much higher chance of losing money, but also a much higher chance of a huge score. The average is unchanged. Experienced whores make large bets to save time, because they know they'll do enough bonuses that the variance will average out eventually.

After you've exhausted the available cashable bonuses, you'll eventually go to the stickies, which are a whole other topic. Suffice to say that the higher your risk tolerance, the higher the EV for these bonuses.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-06-2005, 09:21 PM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Another Question

Is there an easy way to keep track of how many hands you've played, how much you've wagered? Any programs?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.