|
|
#22
10-26-2005, 02:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50-100 hand
i wouldn't say that AK is a "really easy call" but, 3 or 4 handed game, against a tough aggressive player willing to make big moves like GoG, i agree with kane insofar as i'd think AK is good here >30% of the time. 
|
|
#24
10-26-2005, 02:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50-100 hand
I think this post is just setting up KKF to get totally owned in the future. This post seems to totally conflict what he wrote in another thread...
[ QUOTE ] The main reason I don't post my hands here is that I don't want to expose my play or what I think of others' play when I know some of my opponents will read what I write. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not buying this post and think there are some meta game considerations going on here. Yup. Totally.
|
|
#25
10-26-2005, 03:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50-100 hand
[ QUOTE ]
Would have been interesting to see reactions if KKF had posted this hand w/ him having AJ. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. All this "I'd have insta-called with an ace" is intriguing to me. I think GoG's range destroys an ace here, but hands like this make me realize I need to be all-in bluffing the river more. -James
|
|
#27
10-26-2005, 03:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50-100 hand
[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe you just quit GoG like that. I thought you were the new king, KKF!!!!! [/ QUOTE ] ROFL
|
|
#28
10-26-2005, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50-100 hand
[ QUOTE ]
I think this post is just setting up KKF to get totally owned in the future. This post seems to totally conflict what he wrote in another thread... [ QUOTE ] The main reason I don't post my hands here is that I don't want to expose my play or what I think of others' play when I know some of my opponents will read what I write. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not buying this post and think there are some meta game considerations going on here. Yup. Totally. [/ QUOTE ] did anyone here read strassa's post?
|
|
#29
10-26-2005, 03:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50-100 hand
was I close?
-Jason
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
