Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2005, 06:43 PM
WriterBoy WriterBoy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Moneymaker implosion?

Donkeymaker busted out after pushing all in with 72h from the small blind.

Um, what?

Was he just trying to get on tv? If he bluffs with that, it would be good publicity, but come on dude.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2005, 06:44 PM
Autocratic Autocratic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D.C.
Posts: 128
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

He was clearly trying to steal it, you can't say it was a terrible move without seeing all the factors involved.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2005, 06:54 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: watching channel 9
Posts: 824
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

[ QUOTE ]
Donkeymaker

[/ QUOTE ]
how many bracelets do you have?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2005, 06:59 PM
Willy Willy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

[ QUOTE ]

If he bluffs with that,

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you bluff with AA??
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:01 PM
Hold'me Hold'me is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

He was short-stacked and in the SB.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:11 PM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 66
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

If he bluffs the cards are basically meaningless. Whether it is 96 or 72.. not much difference
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:14 PM
KingCon KingCon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 70
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

[ QUOTE ]
He was clearly trying to steal it, you can't say it was a terrible move without seeing all the factors involved.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah we can only call it a bad move if an amateur does it. And if an amateur wins with 7-2 hes a bad player but if a pro does it,he had a good read and pot odds.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:17 PM
PartySNGer PartySNGer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He was clearly trying to steal it, you can't say it was a terrible move without seeing all the factors involved.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah we can only call it a bad move if an amateur does it. And if an amateur wins with 7-2 hes a bad player but if a pro does it,he had a good read and pot odds.

[/ QUOTE ]


If you play SNGs, you obviously must not be very good. When you get shortstacked do you wait for a premium hand and if it never comes you get blinded out? Without seeing all the hand specifics, you can't really criticize the play. If I'm getting shortstacked and it's folded to me in the SB, I would take my chances with nearly any 2.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:17 PM
Army Eye Army Eye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 75
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

WHen has an amateur ever been criticized for trying to steal the blinds with a bluff?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:20 PM
TylerD TylerD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 671
Default Re: Moneymaker implosion?

well, no. but i get your point.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.