Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: .
Trix 24 21.43%
David Sklansky 88 78.57%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-30-2005, 01:29 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: ITM Hand

He has to be calling with some pretty weak shat for this push to be -$EV.

It's pretty hard to guess a range for a guy who probably wants to be tight, but is pissed at you.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-30-2005, 02:05 AM
Newt_Buggs Newt_Buggs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, the $50s
Posts: 760
Default Re: ITM Hand

I don't see how you can fold here unless the guy is a maniac. Saying that you don't need 600 chips is a bogus argument, those chips are important.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-30-2005, 02:31 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: ITM Hand


Very very clear push IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-30-2005, 02:50 AM
ChuckNorris ChuckNorris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 54
Default Re: ITM Hand

I am assuming here that these are stack sizes before posting.

My instincts told me to push, and I voted for it.

Then I thought that a reasonable average calling range for the villain could be something like A7, KJ, QJ, 66 (16,8% of hands). Could easily be a bit looser or a bit tighter, of course.

According to my windows notepad + poker calculator ICM calculations this would be a +0,02 equity of the prizepool push given my approximated calling range. Feel free to check out the correctness of my results if you have the sit'n'go analyzer which I really need to purchase.

Edit: I guess the given calling range is donkishly loose, but so are the 50+5'ers who think they are good [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-30-2005, 02:54 AM
ChuckNorris ChuckNorris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 54
Default Re: ITM Hand

curtains said:
[ QUOTE ]
Very very clear push IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

What kind of a calling range would you put the villain on, may I ask?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-01-2005, 01:54 AM
SuitedSixes SuitedSixes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 220
Default Re: ITM Hand

What difference does 600 chips make on the bubble when you have the chip lead? Are you going to be able to lose one extra coin flip when it comes down to HU because of it? 3 Handed you are concerned with chips in blocks of thousands, not hundreds. HU you are concerned with chips in terms of blocks of 2500s, not hundreds.

With the chip lead you have to goals:

1) Get HU
2) Get HU with more than 5000 chips.

You are looking to get #2 to make a mistake against you . . . a mistake like pushing 83o.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-01-2005, 02:26 AM
Newt_Buggs Newt_Buggs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, the $50s
Posts: 760
Default Re: ITM Hand

Does having more chips give you a significant strategic advantage heads up? If so how? I don't mean that to sound condescending, I really am interested.

The way that I see it, every chip increases your chance of winning HU, and 600 is a lot of chips. Furthermore, we're not talking about just stealing 600 chips, but a 1200 chip swing. Folding this makes you 1200 chips poorer in relation to him than pushing. If my stack was injected with 1200 chips every time I got HU it would do wonders to my ROI. Given that he will probably only call around 10% of the time and you can still suckout 25% of the time it seems like folding is giving up a lot here.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-01-2005, 02:42 AM
zkzkz zkzkz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22
Default Re: ITM Hand

I don't really get it. If it were heads-up just you and him with those stacks and these blinds, would you push with 83o? If you're going to push with 83o I guess that means you'll just push any two cards every hand? That doesn't sound right.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-01-2005, 02:43 AM
The Yugoslavian The Yugoslavian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 130
Default Re: ITM Hand

[ QUOTE ]
I don't really get it. If it were heads-up just you and him with those stacks and these blinds, would you push with 83o? If you're going to push with 83o I guess that means you'll just push any two cards every hand? That doesn't sound right.

[/ QUOTE ]

Look at the stack sizes and position...put yourself in the BB's shoes.

Yugoslav
Who still isn't sure what the best play is here...[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-01-2005, 02:50 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: ITM Hand

[ QUOTE ]
You are looking to get #2 to make a mistake against you . . . a mistake like pushing 83o.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meaning you are prepared to call #2 with what?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.