|
|
#1
11-23-2005, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Yendi
Mark and I came up with a new game at dinner tonight, that for process reasons I've decided to call Yendi. It's a seven-card stud game, played nine-handed. The dealer is not in action, but before beginning the hand, chooses High, High/Low, or Low (Razz) (marked by a button or something, not sure what mechanism would be best here) but doesn't tell anybody. The game is played as normal seven-card stud, except you don't find out what game you were actually playing until showdown.
Thoughts? 
|
|
#2
11-23-2005, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yendi
Collusion would be ridiculious in this game.
|
|
#3
11-23-2005, 10:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yendi
I had thought that the dealer got to play, so that the other players could try to determine from his action what was appropriate. But I agree that this would be too huge of an advantage.
|
|
#4
11-24-2005, 12:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yendi
[ QUOTE ]
Collusion would be ridiculious in this game. [/ QUOTE ] While I agree, I have to say that is entirely in keeping with the name Tapirboy gave it.
|
|
#5
11-24-2005, 01:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yendi
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Collusion would be ridiculious in this game. [/ QUOTE ] While I agree, I have to say that is entirely in keeping with the name Tapirboy gave it. [/ QUOTE ] But there's not any incentive to betray your collusion partner. Obviously it needs a second level.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
