|
|
#1
03-05-2005, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
have any of you ever calculated how much your average earn per hour is with your rakeback? if you dont mind sharing this information please include the limits you play and how many tables you play.
|
|
#2
03-05-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
|
|
#3
03-05-2005, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
Why does that calculator stop at $200NL? Nobody plays higher than that with a rakeback? I think not.
The calculator stinks in my opinion. I entered $200NL full ring.....10000 hands.....100% rake back. I entered 100% just to get the total rake. I divide the total rake by 10000 and get .1275 per hand. Ive played way more than enough at those stakes (and have pokertracker data) to know that the rake at those stakes is closer to .11-.115 perhand...not .1275. Thats a huge difference. Not too mention that not all poker sites figure the rake/ per player the same way.
|
|
#4
03-05-2005, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
It's a good guestimation, though, and a good starting point. I *heard* that they were adding the higher limits tonight. Unsure, guess we'll have to wait and see if they do.
|
|
#7
03-05-2005, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
I dont know crapola about the tech/geek stuff involved, but you would think the person doing it would use the right numbers?
All you need is the correct avg rake per player numbers for each different stakes. Is this YOUR calculator?
|
|
#8
03-05-2005, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
[ QUOTE ]
I dont know crapola about the tech/geek stuff involved, but you would think the person doing it would use the right numbers? All you need is the correct avg rake per player numbers for each different stakes. Is this YOUR calculator? [/ QUOTE ] It's actually my rake calculator and all the #'s I came up with are from over 10,000+ hands datamined at each level during US prime time hours when the average pot is slightly higher than normal. This may be the reason your #'s are slightly lower. When I datamined each level I also took the tables with the average size pots. I tried to leave out any tables with an abnormal pot average so the results would not be skewed by one table.
|
|
#10
03-05-2005, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rakeback in terms of $$ per hour
[ QUOTE ]
Why does that calculator stop at $200NL? Nobody plays higher than that with a rakeback? I think not. [/ QUOTE ] You = Stupid
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
