Why choose Limit over No-Limit?

[boose_bagina]

Hi, I know this forum is pretty Limit oriented in terms of what its members play, but I play NL exclusively and do very well at it. I was wondering however, what the draw is to playing Limit over No Limit for you guys (or even vice-versa)? Is it that Limit is more math/statistic oriented? Too much variance in NL? etc...Thanks guys

Cheers, [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[qsdaddy]

For me it's limit becuase of all the books on the game. That's what I've learn to play and do very well. I do want to branch out but researching very slowly. Hard to stop playing limit for a new game when I avg. $135 per hour playing one table at a time.

[gotme]

$135/hour on limit poker single table... Which limit do you play??

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
$135/hour on limit poker single table... Which limit do you play??

[/ QUOTE ]

That win rate can't possibly be sustainable at anything less than 50/100. You see what, 60 hands an hour per table online? Maybe 70... I can't see having this wr at 30/60.

[qsdaddy]

I avg. 125 hands per hour and my bb/100 = 4.35 after 180k hands. Like I said above I play 2-4 handed 15-30 thru 30-60.

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
I avg. 125 hands per hour and my bb/100 = 4.35 after 180k hands. Like I said above I play 2-4 handed 15-30 thru 30-60.

[/ QUOTE ] You average 125 hands an hour at 1 table? Even 2-4 handed, isn't that alot? Are they turbo tables?

[qsdaddy]

I play ultra shorthanded 2-4 players 15-30 thru 30-60.

[beernutz]

nm

[siccjay]

[ QUOTE ]
For me it's limit becuase of all the books on the game. That's what I've learn to play and do very well. I do want to branch out but researching very slowly. Hard to stop playing limit for a new game when I avg. $135 per hour playing one table at a time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Straight Comedy!

[qsdaddy]

I'm glad that my success is amusing for you. It pleases me also.