|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I love variance.
Full ring game. Blinds are loose. The whole damn table is fishy. 5 players limp to me. I'm on the button holding
A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. I raise. Anybody else do the same thing? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
yes, but I'm starting to doubt the value of it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
We're contributing 12.5% of the pot and are only 6% to hit the flush by the river. I don't think we can value raise here because on flush value alone. I wait for the flop, if I'm 4 flushed I jam the pot for value. I'll also stick around for the turn with a pair and backdoor.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
[ QUOTE ]
We're contributing 12.5% of the pot and are only 6% to hit the flush by the river. I don't think we can value raise here because on flush value alone. I wait for the flop, if I'm 4 flushed I jam the pot for value. I'll also stick around for the turn with a pair and backdoor. [/ QUOTE ] what about 245 flops, 33x flops, A3x flops, AAA/333 flops, and simply Axx flops? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
[ QUOTE ]
We're contributing 12.5% of the pot and are only 6% to hit the flush by the river. I don't think we can value raise here because on flush value alone. I wait for the flop, if I'm 4 flushed I jam the pot for value. I'll also stick around for the turn with a pair and backdoor. [/ QUOTE ] How about this? A fair share of a seven way pot is around about 14.3%. Axs will win more than this. Izmet Fekali ran this hand in this situation 100,000 times using turbo sims. Axs won 20.4% of the pots. So not raising in this situation costs you money. The other nice thing about this play is that players who know a little bit but not a lot will instantly classify you as a maniac. Hello action. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
I was using 8 players since you said both blinds were loose. 5 limpers + 2 blinds + you = 8 players.
Responding to the other post, the wheel is less than 1% as are the 33x etc flops. All together they might make up a few points. You're building the pot which might encourage others to stick around while you make your hand. You'll certainly be able to raise for value if you pick up a 4 flush on the flop. With this many people and the pot that big, you might be able to raise for value on the turn even if you miss. I think this is one of those situations that Ed would say doesn't really matter that much in the long run. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] We're contributing 12.5% of the pot and are only 6% to hit the flush by the river. I don't think we can value raise here because on flush value alone. I wait for the flop, if I'm 4 flushed I jam the pot for value. I'll also stick around for the turn with a pair and backdoor. [/ QUOTE ] How about this? A fair share of a seven way pot is around about 14.3%. Axs will win more than this. Izmet Fekali ran this hand in this situation 100,000 times using turbo sims. Axs won 20.4% of the pots. So not raising in this situation costs you money. The other nice thing about this play is that players who know a little bit but not a lot will instantly classify you as a maniac. Hello action. [/ QUOTE ] I get more action then I want in the games that I play in. I also think that raising in this spot promotes tilt. My own tilt not the tables. You're getting good odds to just limp along, might as well take them IMO. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
Depends...Have I been raising pretty tight before this and showing down the goods? If so, then yeah. If I've been getting out of line a bit, and have been caught at it, then prolly not (but if I've been getting out of line, then I might just raise without thinking)
-Jaran |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
[ QUOTE ]
Depends...Have I been raising pretty tight before this and showing down the goods? If so, then yeah. If I've been getting out of line a bit, and have been caught at it, then prolly not (but if I've been getting out of line, then I might just raise without thinking) -Jaran [/ QUOTE ] Then you're basing your decision on perceived table image rather than possible +EV play? My question is, is this play profitable in the long term against this type of table? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I love variance.
I think it's just slightly +EV, and thus if my image is such that I can't steal the occasional pot when I miss, then I'm less apt to make the play.
-Jaran |
|
|