Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: My SOP with KTo in MP:
Raise 27 72.97%
Fold 10 27.03%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-14-2005, 11:57 PM
swolfe swolfe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 632
Default Re: Simple KK hand

[ QUOTE ]
We don't have enough information. What do you know about the MP player?

[/ QUOTE ]

generic full ring player, 22/6/2
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-15-2005, 12:11 AM
Malachii Malachii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 874
Default Re: Simple KK hand

I probably call. I'd say his range of hands is AA-QQ+AK and maybe JJ. I don't play at these limits however.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:47 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: Simple KK hand

Fold - this is clearly Aces (or a very small chance of Kings). It doesnt matter in any case - if the range is AA/KK then you have to fold.

In the 400 game I never see QQ/JJ or AK here unless the villain is a fool.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:51 AM
AllIn3High AllIn3High is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 281
Default Re: Simple KK hand

[ QUOTE ]
I probably call. I'd say his range of hands is AA-QQ+AK and maybe JJ. I don't play at these limits however.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have like never seen a 22/6 player push with less than KK here full ring above $100.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:55 AM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: Simple KK hand

I've posted several 'educational' posts about this exact same (or similar) situation. Call. Yes, you will be up against AA a solid portion of the time, but this will be long term +EV. I'd bet a house on it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:58 AM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: Simple KK hand

Btw, after all the people who said fold this hand complained that they 'always' see AA in this situation, we had people post hand summaries of this situations, and every one should that KK dominated more than 60% of the time.

I don't play at these limits though either. But perhaps we could post hand histories here and share our stats.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:59 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: Simple KK hand

[ QUOTE ]
I've posted several 'educational' posts about this exact same (or similar) situation. Call. Yes, you will be up against AA a solid portion of the time, but this will be long term +EV. I'd bet a house on it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I will happily take your wager of one house, because I just dont see what you say to be true. Villains dont have less than KK here and that has you destroyed.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:59 AM
fimbulwinter fimbulwinter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: takin turns dancin with maria
Posts: 317
Default Re: Simple KK hand

[ QUOTE ]
PP $400NL

Stacks are ~$400

MP player raises to $15, LP cold-caller, I raise to $60 from the BB, MP pushes, LP folds

[/ QUOTE ]

full ring or 6max?

fim
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-15-2005, 05:01 AM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: Simple KK hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've posted several 'educational' posts about this exact same (or similar) situation. Call. Yes, you will be up against AA a solid portion of the time, but this will be long term +EV. I'd bet a house on it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I will happily take your wager of one house, because I just dont see what you say to be true. Villains dont have less than KK here and that has you destroyed.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've had this argument so many times on this forum, my eyeballs are about to fall out of their sockets. I say we all post our hand histories and see if this is true. I'm going to bed right now, but you guys start. I'm telling you that we did this before and it came out that the play was +EV, but I'd be willing to do it again AND make it a sticky on this forum. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-15-2005, 05:09 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: Simple KK hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I've posted several 'educational' posts about this exact same (or similar) situation. Call. Yes, you will be up against AA a solid portion of the time, but this will be long term +EV. I'd bet a house on it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I will happily take your wager of one house, because I just dont see what you say to be true. Villains dont have less than KK here and that has you destroyed.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've had this argument so many times on this forum, my eyeballs are about to fall out of their sockets. I say we all post our hand histories and see if this is true. I'm going to bed right now, but you guys start. I'm telling you that we did this before and it came out that the play was +EV, but I'd be willing to do it again AND make it a sticky on this forum. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Its important that the game is 400 and villain is not classed as a donk. These being the case, its a fold. If the game is 25 or 50 or 100 then I call. 200 I think about it (and probably fold). 400 (my experience so far) is fold. Villain is a donk then probably call.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.