|
|
#11
10-28-2005, 11:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: According to Wagerline
Still, it's not all just wagerline. There seems to be a certain element of undeserved arrogance to the BSPs, like it's beneath them to even think about the game. Also, there need to be obvious points that the BSPs might overlook in their enthusiasm for their "lock". Not to mention that the whole thing has to be based on conventional wisdom rather than analysis. That's why I like the Bucs: SF blows, TB is 5-1, what the hell are the books thinking? TB by 50.
|
|
#12
10-28-2005, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: According to Wagerline
[ QUOTE ]
Still, it's not all just wagerline. There seems to be a certain element of undeserved arrogance to the BSPs, like it's beneath them to even think about the game. Also, there need to be obvious points that the BSPs might overlook in their enthusiasm for their "lock". Not to mention that the whole thing has to be based on conventional wisdom rather than analysis. That's why I like the Bucs: SF blows, TB is 5-1, what the hell are the books thinking? TB by 50. [/ QUOTE ] Okay. I'll take SF +50 against you.
|
|
#13
10-28-2005, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: According to Wagerline
Well, I've decided to turn in my BSP card for this week, but I'm sure another confident BSP would be happy to lay the points.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
