Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:33 PM
TheDudeChad TheDudeChad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 13
Default What am I thinking?

Pacific Poker - $1/$2 (6 handed)

Table is extremely loose/passive. I am the only person who has raised preflop so far, I have already played many orbits.

Hero is Button with 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Preflop:
UTG calls, MP calls, CO calls, <font color="red">Hero raises</font> , SB calls, BB calls, UTG calls, MP calls, CO calls.

Flop: (12SB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, MP checks, CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font> , SB calls, BB calls, UTG calls, MP calls, CO calls.


Turn: (9BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, MP checks, CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font> , SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls, MP folds, CO calls.

River: (13BB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
SB checks, UTG checks, MP checks, <font color="red">Hero bets</font> , SB calls, UTG folds, MP calls.

Final Pot: 16BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:34 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What am I thinking?

standard?

True
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:36 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: What am I thinking?

you're thinking that you have the best hand very often here. I'd bet this every time.

"Table is extremely loose/passive. I am the only person who has raised preflop so far, I have already played many orbits."

this makes me salivate
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:36 PM
AtlChip10 AtlChip10 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15
Default Re: What am I thinking?

Looks fine to me [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:22 PM
TomBrooks TomBrooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .5/1 Full Hand
Posts: 671
Default Re: What am I thinking?

When you raised preflop, it looks like you were pumping the pot to hit a set or you were hoping to get lucky with an all low card flop and/or you were unafraid that one or more of the three limpers ahead of you and the likely more callers to follow would connect with one of the six possible overcards to your pocket pair. After the flop, it looks like you thought you had the best hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:08 PM
TheDudeChad TheDudeChad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: What am I thinking?

Thanks guys. I was mostly concerned with the PF raise and the river value bet. Thanks for the support.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:16 PM
zephed zephed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gorie fan club member #2 and official whittler.
Posts: 611
Default Re: What am I thinking?

[ QUOTE ]
When you raised preflop, it looks like you were pumping the pot to hit a set or you were hoping to get lucky with an all low card flop and/or you were unafraid that one or more of the three limpers ahead of you and the likely more callers to follow would connect with one of the six possible overcards to your pocket pair. After the flop, it looks like you thought you had the best hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are a weird dude.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:29 PM
UncleSalty UncleSalty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Composing Vogon poetry
Posts: 513
Default Re: What am I thinking?

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks guys. I was mostly concerned with the PF raise and the river value bet. Thanks for the support.

[/ QUOTE ]

I actually don't particularly like the PF raise w/ 77 against 3 limpers and blinds that are likely coming along. Your implied odds are awful against players who will chase multiple streets to catch a pair. Against one limper, sure. Against what is likely going to be a six-handed flop, just limp and let your post-flop skills make you the money. Your equity edge against this many players is not very big PF and you are actually encouraging multiple players to continue post-flop by bloating the pot.

From the flop forward this hand is standard.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-21-2005, 09:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What am I thinking?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thanks guys. I was mostly concerned with the PF raise and the river value bet. Thanks for the support.

[/ QUOTE ]

I actually don't particularly like the PF raise w/ 77 against 3 limpers and blinds that are likely coming along. Your implied odds are awful against players who will chase multiple streets to catch a pair. Against one limper, sure. Against what is likely going to be a six-handed flop, just limp and let your post-flop skills make you the money. Your equity edge against this many players is not very big PF and you are actually encouraging multiple players to continue post-flop by bloating the pot.

From the flop forward this hand is standard.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you hit your set they are going to continue with their pairs, from what it looks like your implied odds are improved significantly if your opponents are guaranteed to call down.

True
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-21-2005, 08:01 PM
ArturiusX ArturiusX is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: What am I thinking?

I dont usually raise preflop, but I dont think it matters either way, just preflop raising might give you more highs and lows depending on the flop [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.