Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:55 PM
schwza schwza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 113
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

this would be a very strange line for QQ/KK, starting with the limp-call preflop.

it would be a pretty tricky way to play a flush draw. i figure you have to get outplayed by some particular hand on any line you take, so i'd like my chink in the armor to be a line that villain will rarely take.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:06 PM
woodguy woodguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 20
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]
is the objective of trapping some one not to let them get scared untill you you have made the most profite out of the situation?i mean how are you suppose to tell a trap if you dont get scared when the other guy has not given you something to be scared about?

[/ QUOTE ]

By your reasoning everytime someone checks I'm being trapped.

Regards,
Woodguy
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:09 PM
woodguy woodguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 20
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]
if he c/r's the turn, i have to fold, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Usually.

This hand makes me want c/r my draws on the turn instead of 3 betting them on the flop. Looks stronger.

I love his blocking bet. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

nh.

Regards,
Woodguy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

you've never limp called preflop. opponents did this to me twice last night (once in a 9 player STT, with AA, and the other in the stars 45k, with KK). I almost never limp my monster starting hands, because i hate getting outflopped by the 34o limper and I like to have money going in the pot while i am still favorite. I agree that this line is unusual or tricky for KK or QQ, but playing a flush draw this way from someone who you do not have a read on has become too standard in online play. Now that you show his hand, he really donked this up, I make a note on him being a calling station fish.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:38 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]
No reason to think you are behind, although I hate the board pairing.

I think getting value for you hand is more important than keeping the pot small here.

If he c/r, you probably have to let it go, but I continue with the assumption that I'm in the lead.

You could check behind an hopefully induce a bluff when ahead, but giving the free card to beat you is a catastrophy, and he hasn't shown to be on anything but a draw yet.

I bet for value.

Regards,
Woodguy

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed, although i think the board pairing helps your hand rather than hurts it. how many hands with a 7 in it are gonna be in this hand. 67s, 78s. The 7 makes it less likely that those are held.
I completely agree though... I dont ever give someone credit for a hand (set, etc.) unless they convince me. esp. online.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:52 PM
DeuceKicker DeuceKicker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 80
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]
I love his blocking bet. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? I don't think it accomplishes anything a blocking bet is designed for, and it's not nearly large enough for a bluff. It looks to me like Villain just threw away an extra 160.

Edit: On second look, the pot isn't as large as I thought on the river, so the bet may have some tiny FE, but I still don't like it.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:59 PM
jcm4ccc jcm4ccc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 116
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I love his blocking bet. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? I don't think it accomplishes anything a blocking bet is designed for, and it's not nearly large enough for a bluff. It looks to me like Villain just threw away an extra 160.


[/ QUOTE ] You need to recharge your sarcasm detector. I think the batteries are dead.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:09 PM
woodguy woodguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 20
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]

You need to recharge your sarcasm detector. I think the batteries are dead.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yup.

Regards,
Woodguy
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:30 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

[ QUOTE ]

if he c/r's the turn, i have to fold, right? what if he min c/r's the turn? i certainly can't call hoping to improve.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not convinced. If he c/r's the turn, I think that can very well be a combination draw - J and flush draw, the flush and gutshot he showed you. I don't think 55 or JJ is going to go slowly on a board this flushy, which means the only thing you need to be afraid of is a 7, which is pretty unlikely given how the action unfolded.

I'd call the c/r, not hoping to improve but thinking my hand was often good. I also think that many opponents can c/r you on the turn and then check the river, even if their draw hits.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:46 PM
billyjex billyjex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: whoring
Posts: 242
Default Re: quasi-deep AA hand

I would never fold to a turn c/r. People do stupid things w/ top pair, even in a $100 UB tourney w/ deeper stacks and decent players. There's also two flush draws on board. Also, since their are "better" players there are trickier players who may think they can semibluff the turn and push you off a better hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.