Re-Debut

[ QUOTE ]
If you're gonna post those, hotlink them from the original site. Photobucket will ban your ass if they find out you're uploading porn to their servers.

[/ QUOTE ]



Apparently, it may be against photobucket.com's rules to upload nudity.

The problem is that the images cannot be linked to their original site as it is protected by some sort of "URL-forwarding" feature. In other words, the pics cannot be accessed unless one is linking to them from a specific site.

I have heard that a few image-hosting sites may allow nudity to be uploaded. Anyone know of any?

Or, anyone have any alternative suggestions?

[SackUp]

Total butterface

[Cancuk]

nice body.

gets some points knocked off for missing 5-7 front teeth.

Edit: on further inspection, they may not be missing, just bucked.

[waffle]

[ QUOTE ]

I have heard that a few image-hosting sites may allow nudity to be uploaded. Anyone know of any?

[/ QUOTE ]

fapomatic.com. this site may have ugly ads on it, i don't know, since i have adblock + filterset.g and don't see ads anymore.

[pokerdirty]

that girl looks like she is either 16 or 40.

[diebitter]

Youre choices are too low. She's definitely older than 10. I think.

[goofball]

Remember that girls like this (with great bodies) all look better naked. The trick is to look at her face and imagine what she'd look like clothed, or if you saw her whored out at a club or something. You establish your standard looking at girls who are clothed every day, not naked. If you let nudity influence your rating it will be off, and too high. I give her a 6.5.

[durron597]

My immediate first thought was 8.5, then I rounded down because this is OOT, and low and behold 8 is the most common choice.

[tonypaladino]

She's a 3 on the Tony Scale

So that I don't have photobucket.com persecuting me:


* NSFW *

* NSFW *

* NSFW *

* NSFW *