Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2005, 02:29 PM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 742
Default Typology of Judicial Conservativism

Over the years, people have offered many different ways of typologizing different approaches to serving on the judiciary. This reflects the reality that a one-dimensional conservative/moderate/liberal continuum is very inadequate for characterizing justices. Here's a recent article in the NYT which offers one way to break down the different flavors of "conservativism."

Perhaps the most interesting distinctions are between the "originalist," "libertarian," and "pragmatist" camps. While many would like to think that the libertarian and originalist positions are the same, the historical record shows this not to be case in many areas. And so there is an interesting conflict, at least in theory, there. I find the idea of judicial pragmatism interesting because these people are always labeled as moderates, although in some ways they tend to hold typical conservative beliefs but simply practice a type of deference that rankles the "true believers."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2005, 08:05 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Typology of Judicial Conservativism

[ QUOTE ]
Over the years, people have offered many different ways of typologizing different approaches to serving on the judiciary. This reflects the reality that a one-dimensional conservative/moderate/liberal continuum is very inadequate for characterizing justices. Here's a recent article in the NYT which offers one way to break down the different flavors of "conservativism."

Perhaps the most interesting distinctions are between the "originalist," "libertarian," and "pragmatist" camps. While many would like to think that the libertarian and originalist positions are the same, the historical record shows this not to be case in many areas. And so there is an interesting conflict, at least in theory, there. I find the idea of judicial pragmatism interesting because these people are always labeled as moderates, although in some ways they tend to hold typical conservative beliefs but simply practice a type of deference that rankles the "true believers."

[/ QUOTE ]

Sam,

George Will has written several columns on the basic futility of trying cast judges (or SCOTUS decisions) as conservative or liberal. I tend to agree with him, based on my limited knowledge of legal theory and jurisprudence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.