Is pokerrooms new rake system really that bad?

[JayLeno]

I have tried to look at it at the limit that I prefer - 1-1 NL full ring game and compared it to partys NL, and although they are shifting beeing most expensive, it looks like party is slightly worse:
NL 1$-1$ 50$ NL
Pot P.room party
size rake rake
1 0,10 0,05
2 0,10 0,10
3 0,10 0,25
4 0,40 0,20
5 0,40 0,25
6 0,40 0,30
7 0,40 0,35
8 0,40 0,40
9 0,40 0,45
10 0,40 0,50
11 0,40 0,55
12 1 0,60
13 1 0,65
14 1 0,70
15 1 0,75
16 1 0,80
17 1 0,85
18 1 0,90
19 1 0,95
20 1 1
21 1 1,05
22 1 1,1
23 1 1,15
24 1 1,2
25 1 1,25
26 1 1,3
27 1 1,35
28 1 1,4
29 1 1,45
30 1 1,5
31 1 1,55
32 1 1,6
33 2 1,65
34 2 1,7
35 2 1,75
36 2 1,8
37 2 1,85
38 2 1,9
39 2 1,95
40 2 2
41 2 2,05
42 2 2,1
43 2 2,15
44 2 2,2
45 2 2,25
46 2 2,3
47 2 2,35
48 2 2,4
49 2 2,45
50 2 2,5
51 2 2,55
52 2 2,6
53 2 2,65
54 2 2,7
55 2 2,75
56 2 2,8
57 2 2,85
58 2 2,9
59 2 2,95
60 2 3

[XxGodJrxX]

A few points. PR has horrible software much fewer games going on then Party, and bonuses that take a much longer time to clear. Not only that, but the rake in limit games is in fact a lot higher than Party's.

[JayLeno]

[ QUOTE ]
PR has horrible software

[/ QUOTE ]
Agree! It is amazing that they cant fix it! Multitabling is a nightmare.
[ QUOTE ]
much fewer games going on then Party

[/ QUOTE ]
That is also right. But the most time you are able to play 8 tables 1-1 NL at pokerromm - so thats fine with me.
[ QUOTE ]
and bonuses that take a much longer time to clear

[/ QUOTE ]
Also right. But I use to do pretty good at pokerroom - so that is not really the problem if the rake isnt worse than other places.
[ QUOTE ]
but the rake in limit games is in fact a lot higher than Party's

[/ QUOTE ]
I dont know about that - I havent looked into that - but considering all the angry posts about the new rake structure I believe you might be right here!

[Uglyowl]

Any site that rakes $.80 on a $8 pot, or $2 for a $24 pot is too greedy and high priced for me.