4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?

KKbluff · #1 06-11-2005, 12:57 AM

Is it more profitable to 4 table party or play something like 3 tables on party and 1 on pacific?

Right now I 4 table party, but I was thinking of mixing it up with some other sites...

Any suggestions?

BuckeyeMC · #2 06-11-2005, 01:01 AM

I have been doing the same thing recently trying to clear both of the bonuses. Pacific truly has some of the worst players I have seen. So many of them are loose passive/ passive it is unreal. If you could play more than one table at once it would literally be a goldmine.

KKbluff · #3 06-11-2005, 01:15 AM

[ QUOTE ]
If you could play more than one table at once it would literally be a goldmine.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe not "literally" but I know what you mean. I would kill if I could 4 table Pacific.

grouchie · #4 06-11-2005, 01:18 AM

i'm sure the reason that pacific's games are so good is because you cannot 4 table.

KKbluff · #5 06-11-2005, 01:22 AM

Maybe I should have asked "for those who 4 table, what sites do you select your 4 tables from?"

Reef · #6 06-11-2005, 01:32 AM

pacific = disconnections = -EV

kyro · #7 06-11-2005, 01:38 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you could play more than one table at once it would literally be a goldmine.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe not "literally" but I know what you mean. I would kill if I could 4 table Pacific.

[/ QUOTE ]

so wouldn't alot of people. you wouldn't make as much then, i guess.

34TheTruth34 · #8 06-11-2005, 11:09 PM

4 tables on party AND 1 on pacific. duh.

thread over.