Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2005, 12:03 PM
Malificent Malificent is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Default Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)



No real content - just my biggest downswing ever at 260BB so I just needed to post something somewhere to get it out of my system.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2005, 01:02 PM
Subfallen Subfallen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 25
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

In my experience: yes, these rates are all too sustainable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2005, 01:12 PM
dogmeat dogmeat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

IMHO, you have played the games backwards........

In the 50cent/$1 game, you should be seeing many more flops, because there will be many more callers (on average) and you will get paid off well for playing any pair and ax-suited in many cases.

In the $3/$6 game, you should be seeing half as many flops as you are. A 32% VP$IP on this game will probably insure that you are able to sustain your losing streak.

Better luck to you.

Dogmeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2005, 01:57 PM
Malificent Malificent is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

The $3/$6 game was actually a SH game at Stars that a friend of mine convinced me to play. So while the VP$IP is definitely too high, not quite as bad as it seems.

And yes, I generally do see more flops at .5/1, but I think the 160 BB drop this week has tightened me up some.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-22-2005, 12:36 PM
joop joop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 65
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

Are these all the stats you have? Surely you would want to beat 0.5/1 before playing anything higher? I found it useful to log a decent winrate over a large number of hands before moving up, this will give you the confidence and the bankroll you need.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-22-2005, 07:31 PM
Malificent Malificent is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

Just for the month of May. I actually normally play at $2/$4, but I'm doing a challenge inspired by the one I saw here, where you start at .5/1 and move up a level everytime you earn 50 BB and down when you lose 25BB. Of course, I started the challenge with a 160BB downswing at .5/1. Fun!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2005, 12:32 AM
LImitPlayer LImitPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 162
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

I'm confused, how did you manage to go from .50-1.00 to 1-2 if you never broke even?

Then how did you mange to go from 1-2 to 2-4 if you never won there either?

Wasn't the point of the challange to move up as your bankroll allowed and see how far you can get?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2005, 09:23 AM
Malificent Malificent is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Default Re: Are these rates sustainable? (little to no content)

The challenge started the 16th. So everything that is not .50/1 was before the challenge/before the 16th. Just poor luck (and poor play) bleeding over from higher limits to lower limits.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.