A sexy one with 56s - Page 2

BigEndian · #11 11-18-2005, 12:25 AM

I like your avatar. F'ing Jeremy Foley.

- Jim

BigEndian · #12 11-18-2005, 12:27 AM

This isn't standard but it's awesomely played imo. It also helps that the hero won. You don't see many of these posted when the river comes a T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and the hero has to muck.

- Jim

lighterjobs · #13 11-18-2005, 12:31 AM

absolutely beautiful.

brettbrettr · #14 11-18-2005, 02:10 AM

[ QUOTE ]
This isn't standard but it's awesomely played imo.
- Jim

[/ QUOTE ]

What about this isn't standard?

einbert · #15 11-18-2005, 02:11 AM

[ QUOTE ]
this hand is absolutely standard

[/ QUOTE ]

wdeadwyler · #16 11-18-2005, 02:20 AM

I dont think your flush outs were good...

silkyslim · #17 11-18-2005, 03:18 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Interesting PF call.

Edit: also, explain reasoning in capping flop?

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] this is a standard pf call. He capped the flop because of his flush draw and pair, which is for value with the number of callers and for a free card because he has position. worked like a charm. NH.

SippinSoma · #18 11-18-2005, 03:27 AM

Boring. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

BigEndian · #19 11-18-2005, 09:39 AM

Capping the action with 3 opponents and a baby flush is not standard imo. By the time it's 3-bet, it's dubious that your 2-pair outs are clean. Your trips outs may not be clean. And it's very possible that your spade outs are tainted.

Taking the free card when the board pairs on the turn is standard.

Raising the river is standard.

- Jim

brettbrettr · #20 11-18-2005, 12:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
By the time it's 3-bet, it's dubious that your 2-pair outs are clean. Your trips outs may not be clean. And it's very possible that your spade outs are tainted.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm trying to avoid my optimistic parlays, ie, "well, if they're both bluffing MHIG" type [censored]. I think you should avoid the pessimistic parlays.