|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you do with T9, middle pair? | |||
| Reraise. |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Call. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Fold. |
  
|
26 | 57.78% |
| I wouldn't have bet this flop. |
  
|
3 | 6.67% |
| I wouldn't have raised preflop. |
  
|
16 | 35.56% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
08-30-2005, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
<font color="white"> I voted yes to 3 and 4. I wouldn't tend to use a WA/WB line with 3 unless I had AJ or lower though.</font> Since when does WA/WB have to be OOP? [/ QUOTE ] I'm thinking personally of the standard c/c - c/c - bet/fold line you'd take OOP. In position I think these situations are easier to play. 
|
|
#22
08-30-2005, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
<font color="white">I think in the majority of cases we're not WA/WB. Do you really think #9 is WA/WB? What are we behind to? </font> [/ QUOTE ] I did the poll backwards- hahahah!
|
|
#23
08-30-2005, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
I voted yes for 2, 6, 7 (I think).
If anyone disagrees, let's discuss. While I only briefly skimmed over each example, I think I can make a solid argument for each.
|
|
#24
08-30-2005, 05:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
#2 isn't.
WA: JJ(6), TT(6), AK(12): 24 WB: AA(3), KK(6), QQ(1): 10 #6 i only see us WA of JJ(6) here. #7 WA: QQ(6), JJ(6), TT(6), AQ(12) WB: AA(3), KK(1) ..i think i did that right.
|
|
#25
08-30-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] <font color="white">I think in the majority of cases we're not WA/WB. Do you really think #9 is WA/WB? What are we behind to? </font> [/ QUOTE ] I did the poll backwards- hahahah! [/ QUOTE ] Dork -Jaran
|
|
#26
08-30-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
#2 isn't. WA: JJ(6), TT(6), AK(12): 24 WB: AA(3), KK(6), QQ(1): 10 ..i think i did that right. [/ QUOTE ] I don't normally put TT in an unknown's 3-betting pre-flop range, depends on JJ as well.
|
|
#27
08-30-2005, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] #2 isn't. WA: JJ(6), TT(6), AK(12): 24 WB: AA(3), KK(6), QQ(1): 10 ..i think i did that right. [/ QUOTE ] I don't normally put TT in an unknown's 3-betting pre-flop range, depends on JJ as well. [/ QUOTE ] There's a yellow flag on the field. Penalty: not giving enough info pre-poll. 10 yard penalty, redo the poll! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#28
08-30-2005, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
I voted yes for 2, 6, 7 (I think). [/ QUOTE ] I don't think 6 is either. behind: AA(3), KK(6), AK(12): 21 tied: QQ(1) ahead: JJ(6), TT(6): 12 Not to mention that JJ and TT might not even be included here. And if we add AQs, it's even worse for us.
|
|
#29
08-30-2005, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] #2 isn't. WA: JJ(6), TT(6), AK(12): 24 WB: AA(3), KK(6), QQ(1): 10 ..i think i did that right. [/ QUOTE ] I don't normally put TT in an unknown's 3-betting pre-flop range, depends on JJ as well. [/ QUOTE ] There's a yellow flag on the field. Penalty: not giving enough info pre-poll. 10 yard penalty, redo the poll! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I said the 3-bettor was an unknown. Just up to you to decide what goes into that range.
|
|
#30
08-30-2005, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I WA/WB here (poll)?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I voted yes for 2, 6, 7 (I think). [/ QUOTE ] I don't think 6 is either. behind: AA(3), KK(6), AK(12): 21 tied: QQ(1) ahead: JJ(6), TT(6): 12 Not to mention that JJ and TT might not even be included here. And if we add AQs, it's even worse for us. [/ QUOTE ] This one I agree. I didn't go thru the actual hand calculations.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
