Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:30 PM
Matt Williams Matt Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 82
Default Question about Cano\'s baserunning

Why was Cano called out on interference? I understand having to "run inside the box", but considering the box is on the outside of the foul line and the base is on the inside, how is this possible? It's not like Cano changed direction to try to interfere.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

You are supposed to run in foul territory, and touch the bag with your left foot when running out a single. You cannot have your body in fair territory. It's just another example of poor fundamentals coming from the $200M dollar baseball team. Dumbest players $$ can buy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:45 PM
Matt Williams Matt Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]
You are supposed to run in foul territory, and touch the bag with your left foot when running out a single. You cannot have your body in fair territory. It's just another example of poor fundamentals coming from the $200M dollar baseball team. Dumbest players $$ can buy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gee can you make it more obvious who you are rooting for? Even McCarver said that if Cano was outside the line, it would have interfered more than the way he ran.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:49 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You are supposed to run in foul territory, and touch the bag with your left foot when running out a single. You cannot have your body in fair territory. It's just another example of poor fundamentals coming from the $200M dollar baseball team. Dumbest players $$ can buy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gee can you make it more obvious who you are rooting for? Even McCarver said that if Cano was outside the line, it would have interfered more than the way he ran.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what? McCarver would only say something like that to make it look like the Angels got away with something.

Go to your local baseball fields and consult a little-leaguer about the rule, if you are further perplexed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:51 PM
GuyOnTilt GuyOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]

Go to your local baseball fields and consult a little-leaguer about the rule, if you are further perplexed.

[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, STFU. Seriously.

GoT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:08 PM
Matt Williams Matt Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Go to your local baseball fields and consult a little-leaguer about the rule, if you are further perplexed.

[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, STFU. Seriously.

GoT

[/ QUOTE ]

I love how you can't have an intelligent conversation about a Yankee game with a Yankee hater. Had Cano been 2 feet inside or changed his running path, I wouldn't even be asking this question. But it looks to me that as soon as Cano struck out, he just ran down the line as fast as he could.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:12 PM
GuyOnTilt GuyOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Go to your local baseball fields and consult a little-leaguer about the rule, if you are further perplexed.

[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, STFU. Seriously.

GoT

[/ QUOTE ]

I love how you can't have an intelligent conversation about a Yankee game with a Yankee hater. Had Cano been 2 feet inside or changed his running path, I wouldn't even be asking this question. But it looks to me that as soon as Cano struck out, he just ran down the line as fast as he could.

[/ QUOTE ]
The throw went exactly where it should've. Erstad was set up outside which is completely wrong and Cano probably didn't want a collision and so shifted his path slightly toward the inside. It should've been a no-call IMO, and I don't care too much who wins this game but have found myself rooting against the Yankees slightly for some reason. If the 1B sets up outside it's his own damn fault if he's not able to make a play on the ball.

GoT
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:19 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

nice assesment GoT, I agree completely.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:22 PM
Matt Williams Matt Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]
nice assesment GoT, I agree completely.

[/ QUOTE ]

So do I. That was the whole reason I asked. Obviously on a play like A-Rod did last year would be called interference, but w/ Cano I wasn't sure.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:25 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question about Cano\'s baserunning

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Go to your local baseball fields and consult a little-leaguer about the rule, if you are further perplexed.

[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, STFU. Seriously.

GoT

[/ QUOTE ]

hell no. The guy is asking about a rule that 4 year olds know. As if the ump made a bad call?? This is supposed to be a rookie of the year candidate and he runs in the base path?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.