|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
Are you talking full or short? Ive been playing 3/6 6max for about 3 months and it hasnt seemed to change at all.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short? [/ QUOTE ] massochists and cutters peace john nickle |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short? [/ QUOTE ] apparently the 6 max games are making the full games dry up. 6 max is not for everyone. Higher variance, more skill, but can be extremely profitable. I'm thinking of making the jump to 3/6 6 max, but losing 600 in a session will be the norm. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short? [/ QUOTE ] apparently the 6 max games are making the full games dry up. 6 max is not for everyone. Higher variance, more skill, but can be extremely profitable. I'm thinking of making the jump to 3/6 6 max, but losing 600 in a session will be the norm. [/ QUOTE ] Meh, it happens but if it's happening a lot you need to look at your game. I wouldn't start at 3/6 6m either. Do at least 5-10K at 1/2 6m to get you're feet wet and compare your stats to other players to make sure you don't have any oceans leaking out of your game. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short? [/ QUOTE ] apparently the 6 max games are making the full games dry up. 6 max is not for everyone. Higher variance, more skill, but can be extremely profitable. I'm thinking of making the jump to 3/6 6 max, but losing 600 in a session will be the norm. [/ QUOTE ] Meh, it happens but if it's happening a lot you need to look at your game. I wouldn't start at 3/6 6m either. Do at least 5-10K at 1/2 6m to get you're feet wet and compare your stats to other players to make sure you don't have any oceans leaking out of your game. [/ QUOTE ] if you are competent at 2-4 and 3-6 full there is no reason you cant go straight to 3-6 short. hell, back in the day we had to go straight to 5-10 short *gasp* from what i read on here the 3-6 full game is tougher than it was back then and the 3-6 short game is easier than 5-10 so you should be more than ready. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ]I'm thinking of making the jump to 3/6 6 max, but losing 600 in a session will be the norm. There's no way I'd lose that much in a 3-6 game whether it be 6-max, full or otherwise. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]I'm thinking of making the jump to 3/6 6 max, but losing 600 in a session will be the norm. There's no way I'd lose that much in a 3-6 game whether it be 6-max, full or otherwise. [/ QUOTE ] That's only 100BB. If you play alot and NEVER go on a 100BB downswing, you should probably be playing 5/10 or 10/20 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, the burgeoning popularity of 6-max has been one of the biggest changes in online poker over the past year, more so than any change in player skill. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 changing?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I was talking full. Should I delve into the world of short? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, the burgeoning popularity of 6-max has been one of the biggest changes in online poker over the past year, more so than any change in player skill. [/ QUOTE ] The way I see it is the nits that wont change to 6m are stuck playing with each other in full. I mean look at 5/10, its almost all 6m and you cant really move up without learning it anyway. |
|
|