Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:56 AM
emartin762 emartin762 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

Sorry about this being asked frequently,
I started with $1200 and 4 tabled party 2/4 full ring games and made the 150 BB (in 1300 hands, great run of cards?) for the proper bankroll for 3/6 games. Any advice or suggestions on the transition or how the games will differ? Using poker tracker and playerview, and rated as an eagle if that helps anything.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:02 AM
xLukex xLukex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 572
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

3/6 full is a lot harder.

My honest suggestion would be to take the route of 1/2 6-max and begin to learn to play shorthanded. Don't start at .50/1--it's honestly a waste of time. The play is so horrendous I recommend skipping it as you won't learn a thing.

Once you beat 1/2 6max for say 3BB/100 after at least 10k hands, I then recommend moving up to 3/6 6max. After that you can either do 5/10 6max (have fun) or 5/10 full.

GL, and HF.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:07 AM
smb394 smb394 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The search function DOES work.
Posts: 353
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

If you're going to go the 6max route, $2-4 6max on Stars is not a bridge between the Party games.

$3-6 full is definitely harder to beat than $2-4. While still beatable, you will run into many more good players at this level. Generally tighter PF, and more aggressive.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:12 AM
emartin762 emartin762 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

Well I would prefer to stick to full ring games, instead of a 6 max route, although I will definately try the suggestion of learning the 1/2 6 max in the future. would it make sense to keep beating the 2/4 full game, make it to 300 BB for 5/10 full if it has the same level of play as the 3/6?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:21 AM
Tk79 Tk79 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

I dont think the 3/6 and 5/10 have the same level of competition at all. I cant speak for the 2/4 as I, for the most part, skipped it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:26 AM
pshabi pshabi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 370
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

Why do you say the Stars game is not a bridge? Typo?

[ QUOTE ]
If you're going to go the 6max route, $2-4 6max on Stars is not a bridge between the Party games.

$3-6 full is definitely harder to beat than $2-4. While still beatable, you will run into many more good players at this level. Generally tighter PF, and more aggressive.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:26 AM
bobbyi bobbyi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 14
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

[ QUOTE ]
I dont think the 3/6 and 5/10 have the same level of competition at all.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you are talking to about the full games on party, the difference is not large, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:28 AM
M0n3y0nf1r3 M0n3y0nf1r3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Bank
Posts: 27
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

Well if i were you i would continue with the 2/4 full ring games rathering then moving up. After 30k hands or so on just my pt im rated a money bag and i have the br for the 3/6, but i feel my skill level isnt there yet. Instead of moving up limits so fast you could just increase your MTR. Currently i am playing 7 tables usually averaging a MTR of 6 or so. Once Im very confident in my game i will then move up to about 3 tables of 3/6 until i again feel comfortable to add more tables. But this is just the advice of one 2/4 grinder to another.
-Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:59 AM
smb394 smb394 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The search function DOES work.
Posts: 353
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

[ QUOTE ]
Why do you say the Stars game is not a bridge? Typo?

[ QUOTE ]
If you're going to go the 6max route, $2-4 6max on Stars is not a bridge between the Party games.

$3-6 full is definitely harder to beat than $2-4. While still beatable, you will run into many more good players at this level. Generally tighter PF, and more aggressive.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, it was a typo. I originally had "not a bad jump between" and switched to "bridge." And forgot to delete "not: [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-10-2005, 02:12 AM
Hybrid_11 Hybrid_11 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: Party 2/4 full vs. 3/6 full?

Honestly 2/4 full and 3/6 full games are substantially different. Ive been told, not sure if it can be vouged for but its one of the hardest transitions to make skill wise. I play 2/4 and 3/6 constantly and there really is a big difference between the two.
Since you admitted yourself that you caught a good run of cards in 2/4 might as well stick that out for awhile let your win rate even out and see how well your truly beating the game then take a couple cracks at 3/6.
By the way i never liked playing 6 max games but its clear that 6 max will be the way to go atleast with regards to online play so i would recommend trying to gain some experience with 6 max probably 1/2.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.