Time for a new MicroPoster... - Page 2

Brain · #11 09-20-2005, 09:41 PM

957

TripleH68 · #12 09-20-2005, 09:43 PM

913.

NoChance · #13 09-20-2005, 10:36 PM

I have no idea what this is but the answer is 33

MrWookie47 · #14 09-20-2005, 10:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
My suggestion is that if you plan on being heavy handed with the stats and nc threads, then it might be a good idea to sticky the respective posts.

Long live MrWookie

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a good idea, but there's one problem. In order for a thread to be stickied, it, as per 2+2 regulations, must be locked. Since these threads must be able to take replies, this won't work. However, we will (and do) have links to both in the weekly digest with a reminder about what they're for. This should be a reasonable compromise.

TredWel · #15 09-20-2005, 11:21 PM

411

bottomset · #16 09-20-2005, 11:40 PM

222

#17 09-21-2005, 12:56 AM

311

ninjaunderwear · #18 09-21-2005, 01:15 AM

134

Vote4Pedro · #19 09-21-2005, 01:17 AM

444

Rev. Good Will · #20 09-21-2005, 01:25 AM

[ QUOTE ]
222

[/ QUOTE ]

do you think the microposter(current, past, and future) have/had/will have a bias against already knowledgable posters getting the spot microposters, and therefor avoid picking certain numbers?