|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sports talk shows were more interesting. . [/ QUOTE ] I also agree with this, it was much better hearing sportstalk to broke down all the games and discussed various aspects of the game. With the BCS all the sportstalk is just who got screwed, and who should of gotten a better matchup. [/ QUOTE ] I also liked all the scenarios, like if the #1 ranked team lost and #2 looked bad in a win over a weak team, could the #3 team get the title with a big win over a tough opponent etc.... All that goofy stuff to blather about. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
old system > BCS > proposed playoffs
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
[ QUOTE ]
old system > BCS > proposed playoffs [/ QUOTE ] Bingo. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
[ QUOTE ]
old system > BCS > proposed playoffs [/ QUOTE ] I believe you got this backwards, sir. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] old system > BCS > proposed playoffs [/ QUOTE ] I believe you got this backwards, sir. [/ QUOTE ] I hope that is a mistake. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
You want to see the best teams in the country butt heads. You want Miami-Washington (91), USC-Texas, OSU-Miami.
The best system for CFB is bowls for money + these games between the best teams in the country. Personally, I really like the 4-team playoff system. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
[ QUOTE ]
old system <font color="red"><</font> BCS <font color="red"><</font> proposed playoffs [/ QUOTE ] FYP Edit: After reading MyTurn2Raise's other posts on the subject, I see that the statement was intended to be against a playoff. Whoops. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS or Old System
ruined my post
|
|
|