|
|
#61
09-13-2005, 05:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Angelo can't play limit holdem worth a damn. I have no doubt that if he ever sat with me, dcifer, and scheids in a 4-handed game, freeze-out style, he would be the first one out of chips 90% of the time. And I'll back up the aforementioned statement with a small wager if necessary. TSP [/ QUOTE ] OK. 10 games. You four players. 50BB? 100BB? 15-30? 30-60? 100-200? Let me know what you want. How about we wager $100,000 + all expenses for all players and setting up the game (all of which I would front)? Tommy needs to not be first out twice for me to win. You have "no doubt" so I should get odds here, but I'll go ahead and give you this at even money since I'm such a nice guy. Also, please let me know what sort of odds you will give me on Tommy not being the first one out 3,4,5 or more times. Thanks. [/ QUOTE ] ROFL this is awesome. TSP = pwned. 
|
|
#62
09-13-2005, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
And I'll back up the aforementioned statement with a small wager if necessary. [/ QUOTE ] OK I'll take some of that action [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#63
09-13-2005, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Angelo can't play limit holdem worth a damn. I have no doubt that if he ever sat with me, dcifer, and scheids in a 4-handed game, freeze-out style, he would be the first one out of chips 90% of the time. And I'll back up the aforementioned statement with a small wager if necessary. TSP [/ QUOTE ] OK. 10 games. You four players. 50BB? 100BB? 15-30? 30-60? 100-200? Let me know what you want. How about we wager $100,000 + all expenses for all players and setting up the game (all of which I would front)? Tommy needs to not be first out twice for me to win. You have "no doubt" so I should get odds here, but I'll go ahead and give you this at even money since I'm such a nice guy. Also, please let me know what sort of odds you will give me on Tommy not being the first one out 3,4,5 or more times. Thanks. [/ QUOTE ] Sweet. Tell him he has to pay for my travel expenses to come watch too.
|
|
#64
09-13-2005, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
I'm in, too.
|
|
#66
09-13-2005, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
Well, it depends if dcif and schneids would be up for it.
I'm ready to go for $50,000 per man. 150BB. TSP
|
|
#67
09-13-2005, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
Well, it depends if dcif and schneids would be up for it. I'm ready to go for $50,000 per man. 150BB. TSP [/ QUOTE ] What do you mean by $50k per man? Contingent, of course, upon getting all parties to agree to play, are you agreeing on the wager vs. me for $50k instead of the $100k I proposed? I could probably live with that + expenses (ie: loser will pay expenses of all parties involved). Or are you saying the freezeouts will be for $50k each or total, and the wager vs. me will stand at $100k? Also, please let me know if you'd like to make additional wagers on Tommy not being the first to bust out 3,4,5, or more times out of ten. I assume each of these ten freezeouts will be played until such point as one player busts out.
|
|
#68
09-13-2005, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Well, it depends if dcif and schneids would be up for it. I'm ready to go for $50,000 per man. 150BB. TSP [/ QUOTE ] What do you mean by $50k per man? Contingent, of course, upon getting all parties to agree to play, are you agreeing on the wager vs. me for $50k instead of the $100k I proposed? I could probably live with that + expenses (ie: loser will pay expenses of all parties involved). Or are you saying the freezeouts will be for $50k each or total, and the wager vs. me will stand at $100k? Also, please let me know if you'd like to make additional wagers on Tommy not being the first to bust out 3,4,5, or more times out of ten. I assume each of these ten freezeouts will be played until such point as one player busts out. [/ QUOTE ] I think you need to play each freezeout till the end. Wont there be real money involved in each one?
|
|
#69
09-13-2005, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Well, it depends if dcif and schneids would be up for it. I'm ready to go for $50,000 per man. 150BB. TSP [/ QUOTE ] What do you mean by $50k per man? Contingent, of course, upon getting all parties to agree to play, are you agreeing on the wager vs. me for $50k instead of the $100k I proposed? I could probably live with that + expenses (ie: loser will pay expenses of all parties involved). Or are you saying the freezeouts will be for $50k each or total, and the wager vs. me will stand at $100k? Also, please let me know if you'd like to make additional wagers on Tommy not being the first to bust out 3,4,5, or more times out of ten. I assume each of these ten freezeouts will be played until such point as one player busts out. [/ QUOTE ] I think you need to play each freezeout till the end. Wont there be real money involved in each one? [/ QUOTE ] It could work either way. For the purposes of this wager, the freezeouts would only need to go until one guy busts out. However, if the people involved wanted to play them out, that could be done as well. For logistical (time) reasons, that might necessitate doing them for smaller number of BBs each.
|
|
#70
09-13-2005, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ok, the old TSP is back . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Well, it depends if dcif and schneids would be up for it. I'm ready to go for $50,000 per man. 150BB. TSP [/ QUOTE ] What do you mean by $50k per man? Contingent, of course, upon getting all parties to agree to play, are you agreeing on the wager vs. me for $50k instead of the $100k I proposed? I could probably live with that + expenses (ie: loser will pay expenses of all parties involved). Or are you saying the freezeouts will be for $50k each or total, and the wager vs. me will stand at $100k? Also, please let me know if you'd like to make additional wagers on Tommy not being the first to bust out 3,4,5, or more times out of ten. I assume each of these ten freezeouts will be played until such point as one player busts out. [/ QUOTE ] I think you need to play each freezeout till the end. Wont there be real money involved in each one? [/ QUOTE ] It could work either way. For the purposes of this wager, the freezeouts would only need to go until one guy busts out. However, if the people involved wanted to play them out, that could be done as well. For logistical (time) reasons, that might necessitate doing them for smaller number of BBs each. [/ QUOTE ] Anyone want side action on whether or not this wager takes place? I'll take 'it won't happen' straight up for reasonable amounts.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
