#1
|
|||
|
|||
Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $.25 BB (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
SB ($37.15) BB ($38.15) Hero ($41.30) MP ($4.75) CO ($23.80) Button ($22.60) Preflop: Hero is UTG with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">Hero limps 2 folds</font>, SB completes, BB checks. Flop: ($0.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $0.25</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $1.25</font>, SB folds, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $2.25</font>, Hero calls $1. Turn: ($5) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $5.25</font>, Hero calls $5.25. River: ($15.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $0.25</font>, Hero calls $0.25. Final Pot: $16 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
Ever have reads? I don't like open limping this in most situations (exception being at a loose passive table). I think you played this fine postflop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
any reason you dont like a raise on the turn?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
If I have reads, I try to include them. However, the reason that most of these situations come up is simply because I don't have a read. If I had a read this would be a lot easier.
As for the open-limp, I don't know, I didn't like i either when I did it, but I've been trying new things. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
I think that when villain 3-bets the flop, my middle 2 pair is no good.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
[ QUOTE ]
If I have reads, I try to include them. However, the reason that most of these situations come up is simply because I don't have a read. If I had a read this would be a lot easier. As for the open-limp, I don't know, I didn't like i either when I did it, but I've been trying new things. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is not a good thing to be trying. OOP w/o a read sucks in general. I find in my losing sessions that most of it comes from beeing out of position in a sticky situation. This time you ended up with position, so no harm no foul. And yes, I think you're behind on the turn as well, but the call still seems ok. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
This hand looks fine. I don't like the turn raise- worse hands fold and better hands call. I already think you are behind despite improving on the turn. You have to call that ridiculous river bet.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If I have reads, I try to include them. However, the reason that most of these situations come up is simply because I don't have a read. If I had a read this would be a lot easier. As for the open-limp, I don't know, I didn't like i either when I did it, but I've been trying new things. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is not a good thing to be trying. OOP w/o a read sucks in general. I find in my losing sessions that most of it comes from beeing out of position in a sticky situation. This time you ended up with position, so no harm no foul. And yes, I think you're behind on the turn as well, but the call still seems ok. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not raising the turn because I'm confident that my 2 pair is no good, but at the same time, with 2 pair and a flush draw, even against top and bottom 2, I'm only 2:1, so I'm getting a fine price, assuming that I can extract more on the end. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
which is why the call is fine. Add in the times that villain thinks his AJ is good since the pot went unraised too. I'm glad you agree with me agreeing [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two pair + flush draw, getting passive
Well, I'm just saying why I'm calling not folding.
|
|
|