The OOT Challenge

[Stuey]

What if we did it this way?

Make a thread and people post stating which side they are on. Side one is the group that wants no posts in oot for 24 hours. Side two is the group that thinks it is a stupid idea and that it could never work.

Anyone that does not post in the thread picking a side does not count in the challenge. Then the good part the rewards.

If someone from group 2 posts they are IP banned and everyone in their group is banned from oot.

If someone from group 1 posts they are NOT banned and everyone from their group is banned from oot.

If after 24 hours neither group has made posts then group 1 is banned from oot.

All participants have the option to chicken out after teams are final but only before the 24-hour challenge has started if they see a person on their team they don't trust has joined after they did.

You know keep it simple.

Mexican Standoff!

[MonkeeMan]

How about this idea.

On the designated day everybody makes their own decision and either posts or doesn't post. Then the mods can do an analysis of post quality for that day and write up a report and post it on a day when everybody is posting (except for those people who don't post that day). If the report shows that the post quality for the day of some people not posting is of high enough quality then everybody who did post that day is given a '+' in their title, and anybody who didn't post for whatever reason is put on ignore by whoever wants to ignore them. If, however, the post quality is reported to be low by mod standards, then everybody who did post is ignored by everyone but their peers, and people who didn't post for whatever reason are given a '+' in their title, unless they have '**', which would screw eveything up.

That would rule.