|
|
#22
10-08-2005, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking good
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] When you compute the probability of player 2 picking up AA given that player 1 picked up AA, what value are you using? [/ QUOTE ] 0.000816327 [/ QUOTE ] Yep, agree. Ok, here's a possible verification point: For short enough stacks, BB must always call. If BB always calls, then SB must also play a pure strategy (I don't know if this is rigorous, but I find it to be true.) If SB is playing a pure strategy, then the LP is trivial: we choose those hands that are +EV, and fold everything else. If blinds are 1/2 and stacks 4, and BB is calling everything, SB's hands are -EV if his equity is < 3/8 vs. a random hand. So SB's only fold hands are: 83o,42s,82o,73o,53o,63o,32s,43o,72o,52o,62o,42o,32 o. c.f. http://www.jazbo.com/poker/huholdem.html Do you agree and recover that solution? eastbay 
|
|
#23
10-08-2005, 05:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: looking good
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] When you compute the probability of player 2 picking up AA given that player 1 picked up AA, what value are you using? [/ QUOTE ] 0.000816327 [/ QUOTE ] Yep, agree. Ok, here's a possible verification point: For short enough stacks, BB must always call. If BB always calls, then SB must also play a pure strategy (I don't know if this is rigorous, but I find it to be true.) If SB is playing a pure strategy, then the LP is trivial: we choose those hands that are +EV, and fold everything else. If blinds are 1/2 and stacks 4, and BB is calling everything, SB's hands are -EV if his equity is < 3/8 vs. a random hand. So SB's only fold hands are: 83o,42s,82o,73o,53o,63o,32s,43o,72o,52o,62o,42o,32 o. c.f. http://www.jazbo.com/poker/huholdem.html Do you agree and recover that solution? [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I had a bug, and now get exactly the same strategy as you for the 300/600 problem, and a value of 6.60878 in the BB's favour, as you did. This was a good test example. Marv
|
|
#24
10-08-2005, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: looking good
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] When you compute the probability of player 2 picking up AA given that player 1 picked up AA, what value are you using? [/ QUOTE ] 0.000816327 [/ QUOTE ] Yep, agree. Ok, here's a possible verification point: For short enough stacks, BB must always call. If BB always calls, then SB must also play a pure strategy (I don't know if this is rigorous, but I find it to be true.) If SB is playing a pure strategy, then the LP is trivial: we choose those hands that are +EV, and fold everything else. If blinds are 1/2 and stacks 4, and BB is calling everything, SB's hands are -EV if his equity is < 3/8 vs. a random hand. So SB's only fold hands are: 83o,42s,82o,73o,53o,63o,32s,43o,72o,52o,62o,42o,32 o. c.f. http://www.jazbo.com/poker/huholdem.html Do you agree and recover that solution? [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I had a bug, and now get exactly the same strategy as you for the 300/600 problem, and a value of 6.60878 in the BB's favour, as you did. This was a good test example. Marv [/ QUOTE ] Nice. Two trials is a proof. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] eastbay
|
|
#25
11-17-2005, 11:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: looking good
[ QUOTE ]
If blinds are 1/2 and stacks 4, and BB is calling everything, SB's hands are -EV if his equity is < 3/8 vs. a random hand. So SB's only fold hands are: 83o,42s,82o,73o,53o,63o,32s,43o,72o,52o,62o,42o,32 o. c.f. http://www.jazbo.com/poker/huholdem.html Do you agree and recover that solution? eastbay [/ QUOTE ] Is it correct, that with blinds 1/2 with only 2 Chips and 32o SB should fold? (< 1/3 equity)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
