|
|
#31
07-29-2005, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB
Makes sense... I was around 30/20 for a while but at these limits I've been having more success as a 25/17.
|
|
#32
07-29-2005, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB
[ QUOTE ]
Makes sense... I was around 30/20 for a while but at these limits I've been having more success as a 25/17. [/ QUOTE ] 30/20 takes a lot of practice and is a lot more variant. Just remember that even at 25/17 the long term is truly a lot of hand.
|
|
#33
07-29-2005, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB
okay, here's the river...
River T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="red">Hero bets</font>, bb folds, <font color="red">UTG raises</font>, Hero calls. UTG flips over TT for the rivered 2 outer. i wanted to know: #1 if there were other ways i could play this hand #2 if it is my fault that i got sucked out on or was there a way for me to avoid this.
|
|
#34
07-29-2005, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB
I'll try not to be results oriented.
The hand would have plyed out differently if: 1) You 3bet preflop and kept on the gas. 2) You check/raised the turn instead of betting out. Sure, in situation 2 he would have probably sucked out anyhow, but you would have been able to get 2 bets out of him when you were like a 85% favorite to win, which is like making 1.7BBs. You also would have been able to fold the river, with a good enough read on him.
|
|
#35
07-29-2005, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB
[ QUOTE ]
#1 if there were other ways i could play this hand [/ QUOTE ] Of course... But would you really want to fold someone drawing so thin against you? [ QUOTE ] #2 if it is my fault that i got sucked out on or was there a way for me to avoid this. [/ QUOTE ] You played it fine. He hit one of 4-5 outs (depending if he had the flush ten or not). This is great for you, there was a 90% chance you were going to beat him on the turn.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
