Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:16 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

3bet preflop or fold.

If you just plan on calling the flop, check/raise the turn. Villain will hardly ever fold to one bet and he will put that extra bet in even though he is probably drawing to 2 or 3 outs.

Also, you can't count on BB calling your bet here. You're better off getting 2 bets out of villain #1 on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:20 PM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

[ QUOTE ]
3bet preflop or fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

why do you see it that simple? what's wrong with calling?

[ QUOTE ]
Villain will hardly ever fold to one bet

[/ QUOTE ]
that's the point isn't it? who said i wanted him to fold?


[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and he will put that extra bet in even though he is probably drawing to 2 or 3 outs.

[/ QUOTE ] do you mean he'll reraise me on the turn or he'll put in the extra bet by just calling? do you think he'll fold if i check/raise him?

[ QUOTE ]
Also, you can't count on BB calling your bet here. You're better off getting 2 bets out of villain #1 on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you were villain and had UI overcards a lower pocket pair (lower than a K), would you still bet this turn with 2 other people in the hand? or would you check this through and simply call the river if bet into?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:25 PM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

To everyone taking the time to respond to this thread: obviously thank you for your help and thoughts. i just wanted to clarify, I am not trying to be tricky or argumentative. i simply want to improve my game and thinking both for full ring and this new 6-max arena.

i will share the results when i get home from work (~5:00pm EST) and you'll then understand why i ask these questions. okay..work is almost over, so i'll be back in 1/2hr [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:25 PM
Somekid Somekid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: -20% ROI at the 11s
Posts: 164
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

I think you need to 3-bet KQs preflop. You would be 3-betting PF for value and to get the hand heads-up.

I think you need to bet the flop. If you had a marginal hand you could take advantage of relative position and c/r but your hand is too strong to isolate the UTG player. I don't like the deception value of check/calling top pair since you can bet the flop for value.

Given the way you played it I think a turn bet is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:30 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

My point is that he'll never fold if you check/raise him on the turn, unless he is on a stone cold bluff, which I doubt given the situation. All of this is read dependent; but him calling your extra big bet on the turn might be +.9BB for you if he is drawing as slim as he probably is.

A note about preflop: The problem with calling here is 1) "cold calling" from the SB gives BB too good of odds to call. One of the biggest advantages you have over your opponents is their lost value preflop, and you need to exploit it. 2) Imagine the flop came J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and you completely whiff (like you will a majority of the time). With BB to act behind behind you, you can usually get away with peeling one getting 7:1 or 8:1 but you must fold the turn UI, which costs you too much in the long run.

To 3bet, you must have a fairly loose raiser. Make sure he raises marginal hands (like I would in that position, QTo, QJo, KJo, etc) that you can have dominated easily, as well as medium pocket pairs, where you have a distinct advantage as long as he doesn't hit his set. 3betting then, does 2 things: 1, it isolates him. Since you miss most flops, you want to get BB out, regardless of how 'fishy' he is. Two, HU you have a lot more fold equity, and while being OOP seems like a disadvantage, it gives you a first chance to bluff at a very raggy flop. Keep in mind that such bluffs only need to work 1 in 7 times for them to be +EV, and even less if you have outs to the best hand.

Basically against a loose raiser, I 3bet here and bet the flop regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:35 PM
McGahee McGahee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 735
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

[ QUOTE ]
Basically against a loose raiser, I 3bet here and bet the flop regardless.

[/ QUOTE ]

And against a tight raiser from EP.....?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:38 PM
deception5 deception5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In this particular case I don't mind the turn bet because BB appears to be donating, and you'd hate to see this get checked thru with the best hand after only 1 bet went in on the flop.


[/ QUOTE ]
this was more my reason for it: i didn't want it getting checked through.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this. My point was if we bet the flop and get raised and were to just call then I would check call the turn when I improved with a flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:45 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

Honestly EP doesn't mean as much in 6max games, especially in lower limits where people don't have a good sense of position importance. You're only dominated/far behind by 5 hands here, AA, KK, QQ, AK, AQ, and if he has any of those you're about to find out when he caps you.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:54 PM
deception5 deception5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

[ QUOTE ]
Make sure he raises marginal hands (like I would in that position, QTo, QJo, KJo, etc) that you can have dominated easily

[/ QUOTE ]

I think QJo is about the lowest I'd go there, and it would have to be against very poor players.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:56 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: first 6-max hand: KQs in SB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Make sure he raises marginal hands (like I would in that position, QTo, QJo, KJo, etc) that you can have dominated easily

[/ QUOTE ]

I think QJo is about the lowest I'd go there, and it would have to be against very poor players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I raise QTo in EP at most tables, but it's usually against better (tighter) players. I'm the 30/20 type 6max player though, not the 23/16 type.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.