Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: do you beleive in having streaks
no 6 14.29%
yes 36 85.71%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:55 PM
ACPlayer ACPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Foxwoods, Atlantic City, NY, Boston
Posts: 1,089
Default Re: Do two wrongs make a right?

Exactly.

You threaten my comfort you are evil to me. You dont threaten your own comfort you are not evil to your self.

There is no good or evil in the absolute.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:53 PM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: Do two wrongs make a right?

[ QUOTE ]
You threaten my comfort you are evil to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, fine. Now can actions that individually threaten your comfort level add up to a sum that increases your comfort level?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:57 PM
ACPlayer ACPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Foxwoods, Atlantic City, NY, Boston
Posts: 1,089
Default Unlikely

... nut I am listening.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-20-2005, 11:16 PM
mrgold mrgold is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: Do two wrongs make a right?

Your question is irrelevant. If the result is not evil (on net) how can the action possibly have been. Shouldn't an actions level of "goodness" be defined by the sum of its results?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-21-2005, 12:13 AM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: Do two wrongs make a right?

[ QUOTE ]
Your question is irrelevant. If the result is not evil (on net) how can the action possibly have been.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have a sequence of independent actions, all of which are unambiguously good. It seems reasonable to assume that the sum of those actions must be good. Now, what if you start the sequence out with a single "evil" action? How about if you end the sequence with an evil action?

Even if the "net" is good, wouldn't it be even better without the evil action?

You make an omlette with three good eggs. Each egg is "independent" in that you can either add it to the omlette or not, regardless of what you do with the other eggs. The omlette must be good, right? Now you make an omlette with three good eggs and one bad egg. Do you want to eat that omlette?

[ QUOTE ]
Shouldn't an actions level of "goodness" be defined by the sum of its results?

[/ QUOTE ]

Possibly. A better question is to ask if good and evil are "additive" (action A +2 goodness, action B +3 goodness, action C -1 goodness; total action A+B+C = 4 goodness, therefore A+B+C is "good") or if evil is a bad egg that spoils the whole omlette.

Note that in the first case, even though A+B+C is still "good", A+B is "better".

Now, no matter which theory you subscribe to, how can a series of independently bad actions result in a good whole?

Action A is -4 good, Action B is -1 good, etc... the sum of these actions can never be 0 or positive.

Any number of bad eggs can never make a good omlette.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.