+/- bubble%

[HesseJam]

Thanks for all the answers.

LARGE sample size means > 5000?

[Hood]

[ QUOTE ]
Thus, the calculation is:

Firsts + Seconds + Thirds / Firsts + Seconds + Thirds + Fourths

You then measure against 75%. But you need a LARGE sample size, because of the multiple variables including bad beats, short stacks, large stacks, good luck, disconnects, etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's correct.

I copied the stat (and most of the others) directly from SNG spreadsheet. I can't really comment on it's usefulness.

[JayKon]

[ QUOTE ]
Just a piece of helpful advice: +/- bubble isn't the target you should be shooting for.

[/ QUOTE ]
It isn't.

[ QUOTE ]
$/hr brought to you by high ROI should be the goal.

[/ QUOTE ]
Well, yea.

I was (and still am) trying to figure out how useful the stat is in relation to the other stats. Of course the ultimate goal is to make more money.

Also, the two most useful comments were bubble ITM% related to stack size and Bubble % related to finish position. Anyone with further thoughts?

I'm really hoping more people will provide their stat as there isn't enough feedback yet to even get a feel for its usefulness.