4 definite pros at final table

betgo · #1 07-15-2005, 03:07 PM

Kanter ------- probably amateur
Barch -------- probably pro
Black -------- definitely pro
Matusow ---- definitely pro
Danneman --- definitely amateur
Hachem ----- definitely pro
Bergsdorf ---- definitely pro
Lazar -------- not sure
Kondracki ---- definitely amateur

KSOT · #2 07-15-2005, 03:14 PM

Nice math.

gorgeous · #3 07-15-2005, 03:14 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Nice math.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. At least he learned from his "definate" mistake.

BlackRain · #4 07-15-2005, 03:18 PM

What is the criteria being used for being a "pro" here? That they have played in some big events before? That they make a living playing poker? Seems like there is a big difference between these categories.

I mean, Andy Black has been in a Bhuddist Monestary for the last 3 years. Was he hustling the monks in there? Anyone have confirmation on this?

betgo · #5 07-15-2005, 03:26 PM

[ QUOTE ]
What is the criteria being used for being a "pro" here?

[/ QUOTE ]
Someone who makes a living playing poker.

betgo · #6 07-15-2005, 03:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Nice math.

[/ QUOTE ]
What's wrong with the math?

BlackRain · #7 07-15-2005, 03:37 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What is the criteria being used for being a "pro" here?

[/ QUOTE ]
Someone who makes a living playing poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wonder if you could provide some sources then because what I have read about the players does not correlate with your results.

betgo · #8 07-15-2005, 03:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if you could provide some sources then because what I have read about the players does not correlate with your results.

[/ QUOTE ]

I put this up for discussion. If you disagree with specific entries, please indicate that. I am pretty sure that Matasow, Bergdorf, and Hacham are pros. Bergsdorf lists himself as a pro for 3 years in Cardplayer. Hacham is one of the top players in Australia.

istewart · #9 07-15-2005, 03:44 PM

Matusow is clearly an amateur.

mlagoo · #10 07-15-2005, 03:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What is the criteria being used for being a "pro" here?

[/ QUOTE ]
Someone who makes a living playing poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wonder if you could provide some sources then because what I have read about the players does not correlate with your results.

[/ QUOTE ]

typical internet etiquette (heh) requires that if you're gonna call someone out on posting BS, you are the one that is meant to provide a source contradicting what they've said.