Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:15 AM
Gene2x Gene2x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 22
Default Tight Play

Is anyone playing 15% VPIP and doing well at six-max (full table)? I just saw a chart with the results after 500,000 hands real money play for what I assume is several hundred players. The only hands that the average player made money with were in the top 15%.

You'd think the blind is coming around too quickly to play that tight. I average 45% VPIP myself- almost always taking the initiative from the button, almost never folding BB to a single raise, using position and player reads to make bluffs, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:20 AM
POKhER POKhER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .50/1 At Stars - LONDON, UK.
Posts: 590
Default Re: Tight Play

45% VPIP? Jeeeeeeeeezzzz thats high IMO but hey if you win longterm cool.

Im 21/10 so far(limited sample size)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:23 AM
Obliky Obliky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not value betting the river..
Posts: 86
Default Re: Tight Play

Generally...

15% is too tight.

45% is too loose.

Im about 26ish.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:30 AM
Gene2x Gene2x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 22
Default Re: Tight Play

What do you mean by 21/10? 21 BB per 100 hands at 15% VPIP?

As for how I'm doing at 45% VPIP: After 7,000 hands, I'm doing well (don't want to be specific because number is unrealistic over long term).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:33 AM
waffle waffle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas - 2/4 and 3/6
Posts: 117
Default Re: Tight Play

21/10 means vpip 21, pfr 10.

vpip > 40 is definitely too loose if you're playing a lot of 5, 6 handed.

dude with pfr = 10 should raise more preflop.

the "gold standard" that this forum agrees is best ranges anywhere between 20/14 and 30/20.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2005, 11:06 AM
axioma axioma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 137
Default Re: Tight Play

from the description of your play i find it *very* hard to accept you are even a winning player. nothing personal, just trying to answer your question.

anyay, yes 15% is far to tight. on average you say people are only profiting on the top 15% of hands, but this is very easy to explain because on average people arent very good at this game. simple.

the further above average you are, the more hands you can play profitably - but 45% is just far too high for pretty much anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:01 PM
Gene2x Gene2x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 22
Default Re: Tight Play

Well, here are my numbers straight from PT. Isn't anyone else profitable above 30% VPIP?

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:03 PM
waffle waffle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas - 2/4 and 3/6
Posts: 117
Default Re: Tight Play

47vpip and 43went.. rofl dude, you need to learn how to fold. 6k hands is a drop in the ocean. if i saw you at the tables i would definitely think 'aggro fish'.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:04 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: Tight Play

It could be profitible to have a VPIP over 30, but it is almost certainly less profitable than if your VPIP was at 30 or below. Even then, you would have to be a really good player.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:40 PM
Gene2x Gene2x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 22
Default Re: Tight Play

Well, my full-table stats are pretty similar and I have another 4,000 hands from that (see above). Nevertheless, I might experiment with tighter play to see what happens.

I've tried before but just found it frustrating to wait for good starting hands only to have them go down in flames. Maybe multi-tabling would be the solution to address having to wait so long.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.