disconnect abuse bitches

[lawrence]

goddamit this is such bullshit... i know this is a bad beat category post but this [censored] pisses me off... i hate how theres no way i can get my money back. this is twice in the last 2 days.

**** Hand History for Game 2358514953 *****
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, July 13, 18:52:33 EDT 2005
Table Table 36686 (6 max) (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: ultraEG6 ( $85.75 )
Seat 2: Redlion007 ( $143.95 )
Seat 3: me ( $95.05 )
Seat 5: zippymczipp ( $108.05 )
Seat 4: Zorato ( $139.55 )
Seat 6: Let333 ( $94.20 )
Zorato posts small blind [$0.50].
zippymczipp posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to me [ 7c 7d ]
Let333 raises [$3].
ultraEG6 calls [$3].
Redlion007 folds.
>You have options at Table 54860 (6 max) (No DP) Table!.
>You have options at Table 36742 (6 max) Table!.
me calls [$3].
Zorato folds.
zippymczipp calls [$2].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 2s, Tc, Qh ]
zippymczipp checks.
Let333 checks.
ultraEG6 checks.
me bets [$8].
>You have options at Table 36742 (6 max) Table!.
zippymczipp calls [$8].
Let333 folds.
ultraEG6 calls [$8].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 4s ]
zippymczipp checks.
ultraEG6 checks.
me checks.
** Dealing River ** [ Jc ]
>You have options at Table 36742 (6 max) Table!.
zippymczipp checks.
ultraEG6 checks.
me bets [$40].
>You have options at Table 36742 (6 max) Table!.
>You have options at Table 55318 (6 max) (No DP) Table!.
>You have options at Table 54860 (6 max) (No DP) Table!.
>You have options at Table 55318 (6 max) (No DP) Table!.
zippymczipp could not respond in time.(disconnected)
ultraEG6 folds.
me shows [ 7c, 7d ] a pair of sevens.
zippymczipp shows [ Ad, Jd ] a pair of jacks.
me wins $40 from side pot #1 with a pair of sevens.
zippymczipp wins $34.70 from the main pot with a pair of jacks.
>You have options at Table 55318 (6 max) (No DP)

[jkkkk]

The majority of money went in when he had the better hand, you got owned.

Please don't post unless you have

1. Used the converter

2. Posted because you want to learn

Edit: whoops, so he used the dp, play on a nodp table, get over it.

[Sephus]

way more money has been lost to cheaters because of disconnect abuse than money saved as a result of legitimate disconnections being protected.

[Voltron87]

[ QUOTE ]
The majority of money went in when he had the better hand, you got owned.

[/ QUOTE ]

that is awful logic.


op, it sucks, we know, but this really shouldnt be posted.

[lawrence]

[ QUOTE ]
The majority of money went in when he had the better hand, you got owned.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
whoops, so he used the dp, play on a nodp table, get over it.

[/ QUOTE ]

youre not very bright

[jkkkk]

If villain put him on a stone cold bluff with a low pp maybe and called the $40 on the river, this is not a bad beat.

and no I don't play AJ this way.

[imported_anacardo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The majority of money went in when he had the better hand, you got owned.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
whoops, so he used the dp, play on a nodp table, get over it.

[/ QUOTE ]

youre not very bright

[/ QUOTE ]

Not true.

Bit of a nit, but seems as sharp as anyone around here, other than that constant insistence that NL $50 = "home of the weak-tight." This, however, is probably not an indictment of a man's intellect, and I'd really like to see it discussed.

[jkkkk]

[ QUOTE ]
other than that constant insistence that NL $50 = "home of the weak-tight." This, however, is probably not an indictment of a man's intellect, and I'd really like to see it discussed.

[/ QUOTE ]

It IS home of the weak tight, lol. Make a thread, would be interesting.

[ QUOTE ]
youre not very bright


[/ QUOTE ]

I am now finished with this thread.

[imported_anacardo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
youre not very bright


[/ QUOTE ]

I am now finished with this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]


Dammit. I really want to know how you came by your conclusions.

[lawrence]

1. his first comment is just not correct, at all.

2. he thinks it was at a no dp table, which shows a general lack of reading comprehension.