Tournament theory question

[A_PLUS]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Doesn't eastbay's program do all this math? Maybe someone from the STT forum would know...

[/ QUOTE ]

Not exactly. It is set up for 3 paying places only. But, the theory and mechanics behind his program apply, you'd just have to do the math in a more manual way.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, the call %'s and euqity can be used, but you need to do the rest yourself.

This may not be done til tomorrow. Sirio's Flack post side tracked me.

[West]

Isn't a 400 ante too high for 1500/3000 blinds?

[M.B.E.]

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't a 400 ante too high for 1500/3000 blinds?

[/ QUOTE ]
Good question. At the WSOP, antes in NLHE events were typically 10%-15% of the big blind. On PokerStars (for example), antes are much smaller, around 5% of the big blind.

I'm not sure which I like better.

[M.B.E.]

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm getting 2:1 or better and have any kind of playable hand, then I'm very likely to put you to a decision for all of your marbles.

Then the question is up to you. What hands are you willing to play for the rest of your stack?

The situation that the original poster posed is a very unenviable situation to be in.

[/ QUOTE ]

See this thread for a response.

[familyteeth]

villains allin call range is 8% of hands
villains reraise range is 15% of hands
favourites against the reraise range, playing to trap villain
AJs up
88 up
AQo up
coin flip 50-50 (66 up AJo up) include in push any two range
92% of hands - faded to
how many hands has villain played this orbit? etc